by Coppell's Right Footed 11 » 02 Jul 2008 12:26
02 Jul 2008 12:26We'd have been happy with Little at 32, though. Broken legs often mend stronger than the original bone, so hopefully he'll be OK. Break a leg, Carlos!Norfolk Royal wrote:Yes, he broke his leg in December and is nearly 30. Hmmmm.
I would have taken Carlos Edwards without the cash! If this is true then it's pretty good business imo, providing he stays fit, Edwards is a quality player and technically much better than Hunt. Add the £2.5m to that and we're laughingAgent Balti wrote:I'd take the 2.5m without Carlos Edwards, so I can't say I disapprove too much. Edwards is our type of player, for sure.
Although that looks pretty strong in the middle of the park Kitson isn't very good at playing upfront on his own so I'm not sure it would work.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, I'd take that signing.
If Hunt goes, which seems like a big possibility we definitley need both a right and left winger to add to a central midfielder.
Even if Harper, Marek & Hunt all stay it could still be a very new look midfield. I still think seeing as we basically have no reliable good wingers who can cross left, that it would be a good idea to shift to a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1. Perfect time to try it.
Marek - Bikey - Harper would have enough steel and creativity to batter championship midfields.
Kitson supported by two goalscoring winger / forwards would also work perfectly IMO.
hadnt thought about changing systems-blinkered RFC two wingers 442 onlyIan Royal wrote:Yeah, I'd take that signing.
If Hunt goes, which seems like a big possibility we definitley need both a right and left winger to add to a central midfielder.
Even if Harper, Marek & Hunt all stay it could still be a very new look midfield. I still think seeing as we basically have no reliable good wingers who can cross left, that it would be a good idea to shift to a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1. Perfect time to try it.
Marek - Bikey - Harper would have enough steel and creativity to batter championship midfields.
Kitson supported by two goalscoring winger / forwards would also work perfectly IMO.
The alternative view is that the Germans changed their system half way through the tournament, apparently because I didn't watch too many of their games so wouldn't know.Roger the Rabbit wrote:Interesting that one of the very strong things that came out of Euro 2008 was teams sticking to a system they believed in (Spain and Holland were the two I saw mentioned in an article) and not constantly changing them - especially not changingthem to try and accomodate individuals.
I'm not a great believer in 'systems' - send the players out to play and forget messing their minds up with whatever the subtle difference between 451 and 433 is (not a lot in reality !).
Fair point re the Germans, England have done the same in the past but both with them and us it was pretty much desperation that caused it rather than a conscious plan.Southbank Old Boy wrote:The alternative view is that the Germans changed their system half way through the tournament, apparently because I didn't watch too many of their games so wouldn't know.Roger the Rabbit wrote:Interesting that one of the very strong things that came out of Euro 2008 was teams sticking to a system they believed in (Spain and Holland were the two I saw mentioned in an article) and not constantly changing them - especially not changingthem to try and accomodate individuals.
I'm not a great believer in 'systems' - send the players out to play and forget messing their minds up with whatever the subtle difference between 451 and 433 is (not a lot in reality !).
Players win you games, systems can only help get the best out of them.
ahhh the england world cup winning rugby teams systemBill Oddie's Beard wrote:Apparently the Dutch players didn't like Van Basten's system, so they devised their own in training and he went with that!
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 76 guests