We want a young-ish player to come in who will have a future at the club who wouldn't be a one season wonder..Darren Currie would be an example of a one season wonder. This Ben Watson bloke seems perfect. Unless he has signed elsewhere already?Super Kevin Bremner! wrote:Squad players should improve the overall squad and not indivuals necessarily. Yes he's old but he certainly is NOT rubbish.
rg6royal wrote:We want a young-ish player to come in who will have a future at the club who wouldn't be a one season wonder..Darren Currie would be an example of a one season wonder. This Ben Watson bloke seems perfect. Unless he has signed elsewhere already?Super Kevin Bremner! wrote:Squad players should improve the overall squad and not indivuals necessarily. Yes he's old but he certainly is NOT rubbish.
Which one? I have several.readingbedding wrote:How's your dead mate?
No he isn't. A good squad player yes. No better or worse than Gunnarsson!Royalee wrote:No thanks, he's rubbish.
No better or worse...but completely different.Streets wrote:No he isn't. A good squad player yes. No better or worse than Gunnarsson!Royalee wrote:No thanks, he's rubbish.
Completely... I mean, experianced midifelder, pah. Of course.Row Z Royal wrote:No better or worse...but completely different.Streets wrote:No he isn't. A good squad player yes. No better or worse than Gunnarsson!Royalee wrote:No thanks, he's rubbish.
If we felt that Little should stay around for longer then why not think about Currie?Super Kevin Bremner! wrote:You're missing the point. A squad player will deputise when we have injuries and will come off the bench when we need to change a game.
He's a creative player, a set piece speciallist (do we have one if Shorey goes?) and he's got ability to go past players and get his passes off.
He wouldn't start more than 10-15 games if that.
Young and hungry is our usual criteria. Didn't stop us signing Doobs though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests