Definitely true - also heard that Hammond had a hand in the assassination of JFK and that JM is seen as a potential suspect in planning 9/11. It's all a big conspiracy!Terminal Boardom wrote:After we won promotion in 2006, there were stories about that the club were trying to renage on the bonuses for players for achieving promotion. Was the collapse in home form a sign from the players that all was not well behind the scenes and that there were some nasty rumours doing the rounds about what the players would or wouldn't get?
They were meeting Richie Edwards and Madeline McCannWest Stand Man wrote:I saw Elvis checking into the Millennium Madejski Hotel with Princess Diana.
I'd love to know if this is true!North Somerset Royal wrote:I thought that this thread would be about the fracas in the dressing room before the game on Tuesday. I understand that SHunt had to be physically restrained by Kevin Dillon from lumping Kitson after a remark made regarding Church starting ahead of him.
and so would hunt back!Ideal wrote:Well, Kitson would deserve a beating on the basis of his SHIT performances for us.
It certainly came from a reliable source who works for BBCRB and claims to have got it from Dillon.size 12 wrote:I'd love to know if this is true!North Somerset Royal wrote:I thought that this thread would be about the fracas in the dressing room before the game on Tuesday. I understand that SHunt had to be physically restrained by Kevin Dillon from lumping Kitson after a remark made regarding Church starting ahead of him.
was it before or after Hunt was told he wasn't starting either?North Somerset Royal wrote:I thought that this thread would be about the fracas in the dressing room before the game on Tuesday. I understand that SHunt had to be physically restrained by Kevin Dillon from lumping Kitson after a remark made regarding Church starting ahead of him.
size 12 wrote:I'd love to know if this is true!North Somerset Royal wrote:I thought that this thread would be about the fracas in the dressing room before the game on Tuesday. I understand that SHunt had to be physically restrained by Kevin Dillon from lumping Kitson after a remark made regarding Church starting ahead of him.
North Somerset Royal wrote:HI ST Sorry but it is 100% accurate. I suggest that you rearrange my greeting to show a 4 letter word that sums up what you are talking!
To answer the Rev it was after Dill told SHunt that he was not starting. Shunt did not like it and reacted violently when Kits (also not pleased at not starting) made a comment to the effect that at least he was not being replaced by an academy player.
Church played on the wing Ian!Ian Royal wrote:North Somerset Royal wrote:HI ST Sorry but it is 100% accurate. I suggest that you rearrange my greeting to show a 4 letter word that sums up what you are talking!
To answer the Rev it was after Dill told SHunt that he was not starting. Shunt did not like it and reacted violently when Kits (also not pleased at not starting) made a comment to the effect that at least he was not being replaced by an academy player.
I'd have thought it was obvious Kitson was the one replaced with Church, given they are both strikers and Kitson actually got on the pitch in the first leg as opposed to SHunt. And that the other two forwards started the previous game ahead of both of them anyway.
He played upfront as a wide forward. It was pretty obviously the same 4-3-3 we played away. Just look at the midfield, it was identical. When Kitson came on in the first leg he was out on the left hand side of the attacking 3. Same way as Church was on the right and side of the three in the second leg.Southbank Old Boy wrote:Church played on the wing Ian!Ian Royal wrote:North Somerset Royal wrote:HI ST Sorry but it is 100% accurate. I suggest that you rearrange my greeting to show a 4 letter word that sums up what you are talking!
To answer the Rev it was after Dill told SHunt that he was not starting. Shunt did not like it and reacted violently when Kits (also not pleased at not starting) made a comment to the effect that at least he was not being replaced by an academy player.
I'd have thought it was obvious Kitson was the one replaced with Church, given they are both strikers and Kitson actually got on the pitch in the first leg as opposed to SHunt. And that the other two forwards started the previous game ahead of both of them anyway.
Hi NSR.North Somerset Royal wrote:HI ST Sorry but it is 100% accurate. I suggest that you rearrange my greeting to show a 4 letter word that sums up what you are talking!
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests