Theyve made him available for loan today, the guys already on the transfer list by request and has turned down all contract offers. I think they want shot of himWycombe Royal wrote:I doubt Bristol City will be willing to let him go out on loan just to be backup at another club.
YateleyRoyal wrote:has been very consistent for Bristol City
Whats wrong with that?Isaac Hunt wrote:YateleyRoyal wrote:has been very consistent for Bristol City
As I said above, he's rejected a contract and demanded a transfer. The club wanted him to go permanently but are now willing to accept a loan dealDeathy wrote:He was getting rave reviews last season. Have they since bought a new better keeper? Seems a strange turn around to now let him go out on loan.
Just wondering why they'd allow him to go out on loan?YateleyRoyal wrote:Whats wrong with that?Isaac Hunt wrote:YateleyRoyal wrote:has been very consistent for Bristol City
Probably to get him off the wage bill if he's not gonna play.Isaac Hunt wrote:
Just wondering why they'd allow him to go out on loan?
Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competitionPlymouth_Royal wrote:Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
Then if these keepers weren't genuine competition then why did hamer sign a new deal with club and same for anderson, but last season. To suggest we sign another keeper when Hamer has been given a new contract and been told he will be challenging for number 1, is quite daft. Plus, McCarthy signed a new deal on the 16th so the club clearly rate this kid. Suggesting a keeper when we're well covered for the present and future is a waste IMO.YateleyRoyal wrote:Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competitionPlymouth_Royal wrote:Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
By would do well, do you mean has done well?Plymouth_Royal wrote:Then if these keepers weren't genuine competition then why did hamer sign a new deal with club and same for anderson, but last season. To suggest we sign another keeper when Hamer has been given a new contract and been told he will be challenging for number 1, is quite daft. Plus, McCarthy signed a new deal on the 16th so the club clearly rate this kid. Suggesting a keeper when we're well covered for the present and future is a waste IMO.YateleyRoyal wrote:Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competitionPlymouth_Royal wrote:Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
But, Basso is a good keeper and would do well in this league.
So, in a position where injuries are rare and performances are usually more consistent than other positions on the pitch. You would be happy managing 3 very good keepers and 2 potentially great ones in their 20s. Maybe at a top four team but not Reading. We had that issue with stack when he was here competing with fed and hahnemann. Plus, Look what happened to ashdown. He came into the team towards the end of one season and left because coppell couldn't guarantee he would be at least starting (although it is funny hes gone to another bench!). I dont question the logic on signing a better player in a position but Hamer is a very good keeper, and wouldnt be rewarded by the club if they didn't think he could be challenging for the number 1 spot.YateleyRoyal wrote:By would do well, do you mean has done well?Plymouth_Royal wrote:Then if these keepers weren't genuine competition then why did hamer sign a new deal with club and same for anderson, but last season. To suggest we sign another keeper when Hamer has been given a new contract and been told he will be challenging for number 1, is quite daft. Plus, McCarthy signed a new deal on the 16th so the club clearly rate this kid. Suggesting a keeper when we're well covered for the present and future is a waste IMO.YateleyRoyal wrote:
Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competition
But, Basso is a good keeper and would do well in this league.
Also, by that logic, would you turn down signing Steven Taylor from Newcastle if he was available just because Pearce and Ingi are captains and we just signed Mills? Even though we have good players, surely bringing in better, proven players can only help
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 303 guests