What an unbelievably stupid post. So we'd be less likely to get relegated if we created zilch but scored a few more scrappy goals?Ryn wrote:So. How many people are concerned that we played well on Saturday, postively battering Ipshit in the second half, yet still only came away with a draw?
The team is blending well together, now that Mr Rodgers has seen fit to decide on a starting 11 and a proper formation, the lads really seem like they are putting everything into their performances now.
Unfortunately all of that has come together, and we can still only manage a point at home to the bottom of the league side.
The RTGs are chirping again that Rodgers is the man to take us forward and that he will come good, but the truth is that his action plan is now in place and yet we are still facing relegation.
If we are playing well and still not winning, then we will be relegated.
Exactly. He was in the 6-yard box looking to make a difference. Forget luck, bad or good, the lesson from that goal is that if you keep creating chances and have the balls to get in where you can do some damage then you will earn a bit of fortune at times. How many scrappy, spawny goals get scored at this level? A very high percentage I'd say, so why be so hard on our boys about this one? Church showed the kind of instinct we're going to need to carve out points we supposedly don't deserve (which we didn't at the point he equalised).Sarah Star wrote:I thought that from the replays at the stadium, but whether he knew much about it or not, he was there in the right place at the right time.facaldaqui wrote:It's becoming accepted on this thread that the goal went in off Church fortuitously. Both the commentator and Claridge didn't give him much credit for it. But I've just rewatched it several times on iPlayer, and I think it's definitely a shot, however instinctive. In which case, I'd say it's an excellent goal by Church, resulting from instinctive reaction.
The reason he got the boos was nothing to do with his footballing abilities, more to do with his mouth.....Humanistic wrote:Good post but could you explain why he 'deserved' the stick he got? He wasn't the greatest player we've had, sure, but I thought he was a perfectly reasonable championship right back and always gave his all.
Regrettably, I have to report that it does belong in the top half of performances this season. Forest, Doncaster, QPR, Boro, NUFC, WBA, Watford, Swansea, Peterborough were all worse.Terminal Boardom wrote:You make a very interesting point there RR. If the first half great and the second half poor, the initial reaction is one of disappointment. Whereas, a poor first half follwed by a much improved second half leaves a better taste in the mouth. Reality being that there has been 2 halves of shit and 2 halves of decent stuff.rotherwick_royal wrote: Thought the first 45 mins was one of the worst I've seen, however the second 45 was the most exciting of the season, we actually went for it and were unlucky not to win.
This explains why so many people are getting carried away by a performance NO BETTER OR WORSE than what we have already seen this season!
Just par for the course for those with a particular mindset I'm afraid. They get stuck in a negative mode and, despite obvious improvements, have to lean towards the negative in their assessments.winchester_royal wrote:What an unbelievably stupid post. So we'd be less likely to get relegated if we created zilch but scored a few more scrappy goals?Ryn wrote:So. How many people are concerned that we played well on Saturday, postively battering Ipshit in the second half, yet still only came away with a draw?
The team is blending well together, now that Mr Rodgers has seen fit to decide on a starting 11 and a proper formation, the lads really seem like they are putting everything into their performances now.
Unfortunately all of that has come together, and we can still only manage a point at home to the bottom of the league side.
The RTGs are chirping again that Rodgers is the man to take us forward and that he will come good, but the truth is that his action plan is now in place and yet we are still facing relegation.
If we are playing well and still not winning, then we will be relegated.
If we scored a few more scrappy goals we would be mid table and not bottom three.winchester_royal wrote:What an unbelievably stupid post. So we'd be less likely to get relegated if we created zilch but scored a few more scrappy goals?Ryn wrote:So. How many people are concerned that we played well on Saturday, postively battering Ipshit in the second half, yet still only came away with a draw?
The team is blending well together, now that Mr Rodgers has seen fit to decide on a starting 11 and a proper formation, the lads really seem like they are putting everything into their performances now.
Unfortunately all of that has come together, and we can still only manage a point at home to the bottom of the league side.
The RTGs are chirping again that Rodgers is the man to take us forward and that he will come good, but the truth is that his action plan is now in place and yet we are still facing relegation.
If we are playing well and still not winning, then we will be relegated.
I don't agree that this was, "an unbelievably stupid post" I 'm also happy that there has been an improvement, albeit marginal and brought on by pressure on BR to stop experimenting and getting back to basic formations and a more settled team line-up.Ryn wrote:If we scored a few more scrappy goals we would be mid table and not bottom three.winchester_royal wrote:What an unbelievably stupid post. So we'd be less likely to get relegated if we created zilch but scored a few more scrappy goals?Ryn wrote:So. How many people are concerned that we played well on Saturday, postively battering Ipshit in the second half, yet still only came away with a draw?
The team is blending well together, now that Mr Rodgers has seen fit to decide on a starting 11 and a proper formation, the lads really seem like they are putting everything into their performances now.
Unfortunately all of that has come together, and we can still only manage a point at home to the bottom of the league side.
The RTGs are chirping again that Rodgers is the man to take us forward and that he will come good, but the truth is that his action plan is now in place and yet we are still facing relegation.
If we are playing well and still not winning, then we will be relegated.
If you play badly, you can improve. If you play well, there's not a lot you can do.
There is no doubt in my mind that our performances are much improved recently, we are creating much more, but failing to capitalise, and are still wobbly at set pieces.
The team is lacking a killer edge, and Rodgers is not the man to give it to them.
He asks for a little bit of luck or the rub of the green every week, yet when we get it (Church's goal) he still wants more. 16 games in and you make your own luck, and the table so far tells no lies.
Ryn wrote:table so far tells no lies.
Today's Table wrote:14 Sheff Wed 16 -2 17
15 Sheff Utd 15 -3 17
16 Coventry 16 -7 17
17 Derby 16 -8 17
18 Barnsley 15 -8 17
19 Scunthorpe 16 -12 17
20 Doncaster 16 -3 15
21 Plymouth 16 -11 15
22 Reading 16 -10 14
23 Ipswich 16 -11 12
24 Peterborough 16 -9 11
You don't go from being shit to good in three games, just because the manager starts addressing the problems. The players are now in a position where they can actually start improving their games and winning matches. Give it at least another 2 games before you write off our improvement as having no effect.Ryn wrote:If we scored a few more scrappy goals we would be mid table and not bottom three.winchester_royal wrote:What an unbelievably stupid post. So we'd be less likely to get relegated if we created zilch but scored a few more scrappy goals?Ryn wrote:So. How many people are concerned that we played well on Saturday, postively battering Ipshit in the second half, yet still only came away with a draw?
The team is blending well together, now that Mr Rodgers has seen fit to decide on a starting 11 and a proper formation, the lads really seem like they are putting everything into their performances now.
Unfortunately all of that has come together, and we can still only manage a point at home to the bottom of the league side.
The RTGs are chirping again that Rodgers is the man to take us forward and that he will come good, but the truth is that his action plan is now in place and yet we are still facing relegation.
If we are playing well and still not winning, then we will be relegated.
If you play badly, you can improve. If you play well, there's not a lot you can do.
There is no doubt in my mind that our performances are much improved recently, we are creating much more, but failing to capitalise, and are still wobbly at set pieces.
The team is lacking a killer edge, and Rodgers is not the man to give it to them.
He asks for a little bit of luck or the rub of the green every week, yet when we get it (Church's goal) he still wants more. 16 games in and you make your own luck, and the table so far tells no lies.
If we put in a good performance and a result against them then, will that be enough to start convincing you to give Rodgers more time?Ideal wrote:Plymouth v Blackpool was on tv the other week, and it looked like they had a well-organized team, playing to eachothers strengths. Very much unlike our "insane clown posse" randomly selected by Krusty the Clown Rodgers.Royal Lady wrote:Home to Blackpool will be a telling game then. They are, I believe, currently 5th, but a fair few on here seem to think we will beat them.
I have a feeling this may be another QPR style result.
We outplayed Leicester at home and they have the same points as Blackpool so it seems illogical to expect that.zummerset wrote:Blackpool are going to hammer us...
Half of our problems about winning at home are psychological - let's face it, they must be!zummerset wrote:Blackpool are going to hammer us...
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 35 guests