I can see it now....Svlad Cjelli wrote:But the point is that none of us knows anything until they see him - he may create chances for other strikers to put away. But the scouts & BMc will have spoken to other managers about him, and also seen video etc. Also, he was at Crewe with Simon Church so he maybe recommended him.
He might be crap - but nothing ventured nothing gained.....
'greed, and if we do think something of him we can choose to extend for a further 12 months. I don't see the big fuss really. Cheap signing, might work out, might not. Not really going to send us into meltdown while we give the boy a chance.loyalroyal4life wrote:1 year contract no big deal really
Welcome Ced
It will do if you believe the random ramblings from Finerainroadrunner wrote:'greed, and if we do think something of him we can choose to extend for a further 12 months. I don't see the big fuss really. Cheap signing, might work out, might not. Not really going to send us into meltdown while we give the boy a chance.loyalroyal4life wrote:1 year contract no big deal really
Welcome Ced
This^Hoop Blah wrote:To be fair, I think most of the criticism* is not that he's a bad player but that we've got plenty of options upfront already and it just seems that we're collecting cheap forwards as gambles. I'm not sure the scatter-gun approach is working that well for us but I'm not rubbishing the player himself.
Everyone should be given a chance, but not surely someone with a name like Cedric?andrew1957 wrote:I am all for giving someone a chance but I have to say this is the oddest signing I can ever recall RFC making.
However, when we signed Long for £20K most people thought it would be a waste of money - so who knows. Let us at least give the guy a chance.
What is remarkable is how much our squad has grown over the years.
At the end of 2005/6 when we gained promotion we had a first team squad of 18 and 25 players in total with squad numbers.
After this signing we have a first team squad of around 26 with 46 players with squad numbers.
When we talk about black holes every season, I guess that having a squad nearly double in size now must play some part.

Tredder wrote:Just missing a board and his name.Pepe the Horseman wrote:
I'm not sure what you're counting as a first team squad of 18 but I'd say it was more like 24/25 who were in danger of being involved in a match day squad in 04/05. We had a few youngsters to add to that number like Osano and a couple of loanee's over the year that were on the fringes (Obinna and Baradji).andrew1957 wrote:I am all for giving someone a chance but I have to say this is the oddest signing I can ever recall RFC making.
However, when we signed Long for £20K most people thought it would be a waste of money - so who knows. Let us at least give the guy a chance.
What is remarkable is how much our squad has grown over the years.
At the end of 2005/6 when we gained promotion we had a first team squad of 18 and 25 players in total with squad numbers.
After this signing we have a first team squad of around 26 with 46 players with squad numbers.
When we talk about black holes every season, I guess that having a squad nearly double in size now must play some part.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 592 guests