by melonhead » 20 Apr 2012 10:05
20 Apr 2012 10:05by Royal With Cheese » 20 Apr 2012 10:09
20 Apr 2012 10:09Agreed.melonhead wrote:apart from the fact the last 3 years have been anything but dull, or uninspiring, schards was right
by melonhead » 20 Apr 2012 10:14
20 Apr 2012 10:14by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 10:15
20 Apr 2012 10:15by melonhead » 20 Apr 2012 10:17
20 Apr 2012 10:17The style we've played this season has been so successful that Chelsea copied it and used it to good effect against Barcelona.
by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 10:22
20 Apr 2012 10:22Brian should charge Di Matteo for Royalties. (Do you see what I did there?)melonhead wrote:The style we've played this season has been so successful that Chelsea copied it and used it to good effect against Barcelona.
i thought that when i watched that game.
seems we are set up perfectly to match the best in the world
by melonhead » 20 Apr 2012 10:23
20 Apr 2012 10:23by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 10:24
20 Apr 2012 10:24by Royal With Cheese » 20 Apr 2012 10:26
20 Apr 2012 10:26A noble gesture sir!melonhead wrote:yes, i agree
and ill defend my right to agree with any of you with my fucvking life
by Schards#2 » 20 Apr 2012 10:31
20 Apr 2012 10:31Anybody would there had been a sea change at the club.Hampshire Royal wrote:In my opinion, we have every reason to be optimistic about our progress for the foreseeable future.
by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 10:34
20 Apr 2012 10:34
by SpaceCruiser » 20 Apr 2012 11:14
20 Apr 2012 11:14Quoting a word from Shakespeare doesn't really help you.Schards#2 wrote:Anybody would there had been a sea change at the club.Hampshire Royal wrote:In my opinion, we have every reason to be optimistic about our progress for the foreseeable future.
by Yorkshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 11:16
20 Apr 2012 11:16by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 12:02
20 Apr 2012 12:02
by SpaceCruiser » 20 Apr 2012 12:05
20 Apr 2012 12:05No, he was right on some and he was wrong on some.Yorkshire Royal wrote:So have we concluded that Schards was pretty much right?
by soggy biscuit » 20 Apr 2012 12:14
20 Apr 2012 12:14Royal Lady wrote:Yes, Schards was wrong.......
by Hampshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 12:18
20 Apr 2012 12:18by Yorkshire Royal » 20 Apr 2012 12:34
20 Apr 2012 12:34He was mostly right though, wasn't he?SpaceCruiser wrote:No, he was right on some and he was wrong on some.Yorkshire Royal wrote:So have we concluded that Schards was pretty much right?
by Forbury Lion » 20 Apr 2012 12:55
20 Apr 2012 12:55He was right about the bit's that he has been proved right on.Yorkshire Royal wrote:He was mostly right though, wasn't he?SpaceCruiser wrote:No, he was right on some and he was wrong on some.Yorkshire Royal wrote:So have we concluded that Schards was pretty much right?
by Millsy » 20 Apr 2012 13:19
20 Apr 2012 13:19Hats off to you for being spot on. People here HATE it when someone sticks their neck out against the grain and is proven overwhelmingly right. I got the same when before his appointment I said Coppell would be a legend when people either attacked or stayed silent.Schards#2 wrote:Anybody would there had been a sea change at the club.Hampshire Royal wrote:In my opinion, we have every reason to be optimistic about our progress for the foreseeable future.
Seriously folks, I know they say the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about but this is becoming ridiculous. Having argued that I didn't think now was the best time to be debating this for the 100th time, I was forced to respond by post after post, and then slagged off for starting this argument again![]()
There was a post mortem in February as, at that time, a sea change had happened and so it was no longer hard to see progress for the forseeable future, I would have thought that would have finally put this to bed but, no, it seems, some 4 years later, people are still fretting about this for some reason.
As many seem to agree, taking into account the intervening 4 years, it's proven to be pretty accurate and has been franked by the subsequent upturn in fortunes. "Mid table Championship team at best" proved to be overly pessimistic looking at the finishing positions, however, even then, for much of the past two seasons we have been midtable before a late surge. I would certainly rank it over anything Nostrodamus put out there.
In 106 pages, anything that can be said has been said, I simply don't see the point in going over the same ground over and over again, agree/disagree, I really don't care. If you don't agree, fine, get over it but relentlessly droning on about is not only uninspiring but also desperately dull.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 513 guests