by Reading4eva » 16 Jul 2012 16:05
16 Jul 2012 16:05by Turns8 » 16 Jul 2012 16:07
16 Jul 2012 16:07
by Royal Lady » 16 Jul 2012 16:12
16 Jul 2012 16:12by pea » 16 Jul 2012 16:13
16 Jul 2012 16:13by TBM » 16 Jul 2012 16:16
16 Jul 2012 16:16by RFCUK » 16 Jul 2012 16:25
16 Jul 2012 16:25by melonhead » 16 Jul 2012 16:29
16 Jul 2012 16:29i dismiss this idea completelyRoyal Lady wrote:A rival group wouldn't replace STAR - but it would be foolish to dismiss the idea completely imo, fwiw. Hth.
by TBM » 16 Jul 2012 16:33
16 Jul 2012 16:33Acts like this (below) is probably whyRFCUK wrote:Really don't understand the gripe people have with STAR.
Cypry wrote:Well I for one will not be renewing...I wouldn't normally discuss the content of a PM, but I've had no response to my reply since I sent it 3 days ago, and need to vent spleen...
I had a PM on Friday from STAR, effectively telling me that the situation was my fault, apparently I should have known about the history of these events without needing to be told. It was also made clear that the club and Brian personally are "very upset" - again, the implication being that my actions, and my actions alone have upset them, and STAR now have a lot to do to repair the relationship.
Finally I was told that STAR have nothing against me "because you have shown remorse" - again the implication is that all this is my fault.
What I object to is the fact that STAR seem to want to lay all responsibility at my door for this, and take no responsibility whatsoever themselves. As I've said repeatedly, if we'd been told the forum was "between these four walls" I'd have honoured that...
I don't believe for a minute that Brian is genuinely "very upset" - I'm sure he has far more important things to worry about, but I'll be meeting him in a couple of weeks, so I'll ask and apologise if necessary - let's hope STAR are telling the truth or they'll look very silly...
by HoneyRoastHoax » 16 Jul 2012 16:35
16 Jul 2012 16:35by Royal Biscuitman » 16 Jul 2012 16:38
16 Jul 2012 16:38
by Royal Lady » 16 Jul 2012 16:43
16 Jul 2012 16:43by From Despair To Where? » 16 Jul 2012 16:48
16 Jul 2012 16:48by Geekins » 16 Jul 2012 16:51
16 Jul 2012 16:51TBM wrote:Or we could just sign up and do everything we can to "ruin the relationship between them and the club" - you know things like not hitting the like button on the facebook page when a story appears informing us the new kit is on sale in the megastore OR we take food and drink on the supporters coach for the trip up to Sunderland OR we mention to the team board that we play our home games at the Madejski Stadium etc etc
by Caskeys Lovechild » 16 Jul 2012 16:56
16 Jul 2012 16:56by Silver Fox » 16 Jul 2012 16:59
16 Jul 2012 16:59HArd to be with you when you don't say whether you're for or against the propositionReading4eva wrote:After that farce, I think many people would be with me on this
by Royal Lady » 16 Jul 2012 17:04
16 Jul 2012 17:04Silver Fox wrote:HArd to be with you when you don't say whether you're for or against the propositionReading4eva wrote:After that farce, I think many people would be with me on this
by Zaretsky » 16 Jul 2012 17:14
16 Jul 2012 17:14I disagree that it's a lack of 'customer' service - they treat their customers exactly as any business would that maintains a monopoly over a product. Treat them as supporters, fans, partners, citizens, stakeholders (or even one day shareholders - heaven forbid!) and you have a different set of priorities and responsibilities coming into play.Caskeys Lovechild wrote:
I would be happy to join and help with any organisation designed to keep RFC in line, and in touch with its CUSTOMERS, and make the experience of supporting Reading FC better one. Something which STAR fail to do completely.
by Barry the bird boggler » 16 Jul 2012 17:28
16 Jul 2012 17:28STAR do usually say something about the Forum being for "these four walls only" at the start - if they don't do this and someone gets "ahead of the game" then IMO they can't really blame anyone other than themselves, as how are people meant to know if they're not told, it could be someone's first visit after all...TBM wrote:Acts like this (below) is probably whyRFCUK wrote:Really don't understand the gripe people have with STAR.
Cypry wrote:Well I for one will not be renewing...I wouldn't normally discuss the content of a PM, but I've had no response to my reply since I sent it 3 days ago, and need to vent spleen...
I had a PM on Friday from STAR, effectively telling me that the situation was my fault, apparently I should have known about the history of these events without needing to be told. It was also made clear that the club and Brian personally are "very upset" - again, the implication being that my actions, and my actions alone have upset them, and STAR now have a lot to do to repair the relationship.
Finally I was told that STAR have nothing against me "because you have shown remorse" - again the implication is that all this is my fault.
What I object to is the fact that STAR seem to want to lay all responsibility at my door for this, and take no responsibility whatsoever themselves. As I've said repeatedly, if we'd been told the forum was "between these four walls" I'd have honoured that...
I don't believe for a minute that Brian is genuinely "very upset" - I'm sure he has far more important things to worry about, but I'll be meeting him in a couple of weeks, so I'll ask and apologise if necessary - let's hope STAR are telling the truth or they'll look very silly...
by Royal Biscuitman » 16 Jul 2012 17:29
16 Jul 2012 17:29Why destroy positives?TBM wrote:Or we could just sign up and do everything we can to "ruin the relationship between them and the club" - you know things like not hitting the like button on the facebook page when a story appears informing us the new kit is on sale in the megastore OR we take food and drink on the supporters coach for the trip up to Sunderland OR we mention to the team board that we play our home games at the Madejski Stadium etc etc
by TBM » 16 Jul 2012 17:32
16 Jul 2012 17:32Yeah, i wasn't actually being seriousRoyal Biscuitman wrote:Why destroy positives?TBM wrote:Or we could just sign up and do everything we can to "ruin the relationship between them and the club" - you know things like not hitting the like button on the facebook page when a story appears informing us the new kit is on sale in the megastore OR we take food and drink on the supporters coach for the trip up to Sunderland OR we mention to the team board that we play our home games at the Madejski Stadium etc etc
The relationship between STAR and the club is strong, as are the lines of communication and these can be used for the benefit of supporters so there is nothing to be gained by anyone by destroying this, However the relationship between STAR and the supporters needs fixing & fast and perhaps a realignment of STAR so that the supporters are the focus of the supporters trust & perhaps more importantly, are seen to be the focus.
Likewise the travel, why sabotage the relationship between STAR and Horseman (or whoever provides coaches these days) as this is a valuable service to many fans.
As for facebook likes/not clicking like.... meh.
If a new organisation is required, it is to represent the views of the fans and communicate these to the club and to feed back to the fans the response from the club - basically, it's all about communications. In addition to this, it can provide communications between fans - those with a problem and those who may be able to solve the problem or to bring fans together. This is all something that should be on the STAR remit and should be the focus..... maybe it is, but again communication is key.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests