Oh it's "I can't read" Country Royal again.CountryRoyal wrote:You think that we are ONE player away from being a top 2 side?Woodcote Royal wrote:Or, that he has a brain and you don't.CountryRoyal wrote:
Sorry, what?![]()
Just further compounding the notion that you are in fact mental.
Enjoyed tonight and was going to offer some of my own thoughts but I think I'll leave it there.................
Ok then....
However Kermorgant is not a solo striker, he needs someone to play off otherwise all his flicks and knock-ons don't go anywhere. I would have expected more from Beerens and McCleary in reading those flicks given we had 3 at the back (and that's another point, if you're going to play 3 at the back surely Blackett is the obvious choice rather than Evans or Berg) but there was still too large a disconnect there.Sanguine wrote:Kermogant. Won almost everything in the air, good lay-offs, good link play. Noel Hunt would have loved to play with him
Don't disagree with this Snowball. I'd also say that Kermorgant is arguably our best forward in the air since Noel Hunt. Like a salmon!
Yup, almost like it's crying out to be 442Sanguine wrote:Kermogant. Won almost everything in the air, good lay-offs, good link play. Noel Hunt would have loved to play with him
Don't disagree with this Snowball. I'd also say that Kermorgant is arguably our best forward in the air since Noel Hunt. Like a salmon!
stop forcing your dilusions on us you mentalSnowball wrote:So with a striker in hot form, we wouldn't be one point better off (the play-offs)CountryRoyal wrote:Sorry, what?Snowball wrote:With a striker in form we'd be pushing the automatics ATM.![]()
Just further compounding the notion that you are in fact mental.
or 2-3 points better off (14 points, one behind the automatics)?
?
I think even with an ALF we would have 3 more pointsSnowball wrote:So with a striker in hot form, we wouldn't be one point better off (the play-offs)CountryRoyal wrote:Sorry, what?Snowball wrote:With a striker in form we'd be pushing the automatics ATM.![]()
Just further compounding the notion that you are in fact mental.
or 2-3 points better off (14 points, one behind the automatics)?
I don't for a second think we have a chance in hell of competing with the likes of Newcastle,
and I don't think we'll make the POs, either, but currently, facts are facts. We DON'T have a red-hot
striker in form, we AREN'T scoring goals despite the possession stats, and it is perfectly logical to imagine
(even it was temporary and a false dawn) that if we had someone doing really well goal-wise, we would be
"pushing the automatics".
Or are you saying if we had a Long or a Doyle or a Kitson at their best, we would NOT be comfortably in the PO positions and pressing 14-15 points?
+1 Thanks Sam, saved me the bother having to write exactly this. Comments earlier in this thread about McCleary playing well totally baffle me.Saaaaaaaammmmmm wrote:Williams infuriates me at the best of times, but tonight was on another level, suppose it's the result of an accumulation of frustrating performances from him
He just has no ball control whatsoever. The ball bounces off him for his first touch, and when dribbling he never once looks like he knows what he's doing or where he's going.
It was his passing tonight though that was driving me mad, lost count the amount of times we lost momentum because Williams played a simple pass poorly, usually behind Gunter or Obita stopping us from going forward. He literally has no excuse, an international footballer should know which side of a teammate to kick the ball to and be able to execute the simple pass, I cannot believe he gets it wrong nearly every time. Like I said, the player has to either slow down, or check back because the pass from Williams has prevented them running onto it or with it.
'Yeah but he brings energy' - so? Energy literally adds nothing to our team. Someone like Kante brings energy, but he uses it to win tackles and interceptions and drive his team forward. When does Williams ever make a tackle or break up the play? Come on Jaap, get Swift in so I can start finding another scapegoat.
As for the game, just incredibly boring I'm afraid. Lots of people on Twitter asking if there were any boos tonight (there weren't), but this is the thing, it's alright for you sat at home on Twitter, but a lot of us made a big commitment tonight to go the match, and ultimately it was an evening wasted. Personally, I had a few options for this Tuesday evening but I turned them down so I could go the game and having sat through 90 minutes of literally nothing happening, I really regret my decision. If games like this become a regular occurrence, I'm not sure I really want to commit to spending afternoons or evenings watching 75% possession with no excitement whatsoever. It's a lot of time and money (I have very little of either) to get to Reading for a game, so I could quickly lose patience with the team if we continue this 'transition season'.
Back to the pitch, thought formation was a bit strange, seemed Evans took my comments from the Ipswich game about not being a passing option literally and spent the whole game with the centre-backs. Meant we had McShane and Moore almost bombing down the flanks for a lot of the game.
Kermorgant was decent for 60 minutes, then got injured, but for some reason didn't come off? Meant he spent the last half hour hobbling around slowly, not really jumping for anything in the air, and as a result our attack completely fizzled out. Also felt the subs took too long, 10 minutes for Harriott and 5 for Mendes is a bit pointless really, and shame Swift only got 20.
McCleary was very bad unfortunately, crossing was completely awful. The slow drifted corner to the edge of the penalty area didn't work the first few times, so not sure why he kept at it. 12 corners with a decent set-piece taker might have led to something, but with Garath we never threatened. McShane had a header where he had no one within 5 yards of him, yet was never going to score because of where he was and the speed the ball came to him. Get Swift in the team and get him on corners.
Yes Birmingham results-wise are a decent team and had won 3 on the bounce, but if you have near 75% possession, you should be winning matches, or at least creating chances and scoring goals. I'm not sure how much of a miss Joey was, but hopefully he'll be back for the weekend and we can test ourselves against the league's top scorers on Saturday
winning in the air is great, but when you know there is no one beyond you, flicking it on is no good.Sutekh wrote:However Kermorgant is not a solo striker, he needs someone to play off otherwise all his flicks and knock-ons don't go anywhere. I would have expected more from Beerens and McCleary in reading those flicks given we had 3 at the back (and that's another point, if you're going to play 3 at the back surely Blackett is the obvious choice rather than Evans or Berg) but there was still too large a disconnect there.Sanguine wrote:Kermogant. Won almost everything in the air, good lay-offs, good link play. Noel Hunt would have loved to play with him
Don't disagree with this Snowball. I'd also say that Kermorgant is arguably our best forward in the air since Noel Hunt. Like a salmon!
agree on that, a lot of floaty nonsense last night, from cross and corner.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Ibrahimovic wouldn't have scored for us last night. A top striker will make no difference until the team figures out how to actually create chances.
Lots of nice possession but didn't make their keeper work at all. I feel like i'm on a loop from the Adkins era.
However, we do look better on the ball than under Adkins, so fingers crossed we can actually learn to attack at some point this season. And cross the frigging ball in a way that allows people to attack it!
yeah.Snowball wrote:You don't think Alfie would have got on the end of 2-3-4 of those flicks?
You don't think Kermie could have headed forward for Long on a run?
God knows why the wingers aren't in there picking up the pieces,
maybe cos they are wingers, but they don't look like they are gambling
on the flicks, and there are plenty of them. kermis wins almost every header.
I'd like to see Harriot have a go on the wing and maybe McCleary at ten if Swift isn't there.
made some mistakes,(agree on the floaty nonsense) but pretty much won every one of our twelve corners, and delivered most of our crosses. and along with beerens was our only attacking threat.ladida_gunner_graham wrote:+1 Thanks Sam, saved me the bother having to write exactly this. Comments earlier in this thread about McCleary playing well totally baffle me.Saaaaaaaammmmmm wrote:Williams infuriates me at the best of times, but tonight was on another level, suppose it's the result of an accumulation of frustrating performances from him
He just has no ball control whatsoever. The ball bounces off him for his first touch, and when dribbling he never once looks like he knows what he's doing or where he's going.
It was his passing tonight though that was driving me mad, lost count the amount of times we lost momentum because Williams played a simple pass poorly, usually behind Gunter or Obita stopping us from going forward. He literally has no excuse, an international footballer should know which side of a teammate to kick the ball to and be able to execute the simple pass, I cannot believe he gets it wrong nearly every time. Like I said, the player has to either slow down, or check back because the pass from Williams has prevented them running onto it or with it.
'Yeah but he brings energy' - so? Energy literally adds nothing to our team. Someone like Kante brings energy, but he uses it to win tackles and interceptions and drive his team forward. When does Williams ever make a tackle or break up the play? Come on Jaap, get Swift in so I can start finding another scapegoat.
As for the game, just incredibly boring I'm afraid. Lots of people on Twitter asking if there were any boos tonight (there weren't), but this is the thing, it's alright for you sat at home on Twitter, but a lot of us made a big commitment tonight to go the match, and ultimately it was an evening wasted. Personally, I had a few options for this Tuesday evening but I turned them down so I could go the game and having sat through 90 minutes of literally nothing happening, I really regret my decision. If games like this become a regular occurrence, I'm not sure I really want to commit to spending afternoons or evenings watching 75% possession with no excitement whatsoever. It's a lot of time and money (I have very little of either) to get to Reading for a game, so I could quickly lose patience with the team if we continue this 'transition season'.
Back to the pitch, thought formation was a bit strange, seemed Evans took my comments from the Ipswich game about not being a passing option literally and spent the whole game with the centre-backs. Meant we had McShane and Moore almost bombing down the flanks for a lot of the game.
Kermorgant was decent for 60 minutes, then got injured, but for some reason didn't come off? Meant he spent the last half hour hobbling around slowly, not really jumping for anything in the air, and as a result our attack completely fizzled out. Also felt the subs took too long, 10 minutes for Harriott and 5 for Mendes is a bit pointless really, and shame Swift only got 20.
McCleary was very bad unfortunately, crossing was completely awful. The slow drifted corner to the edge of the penalty area didn't work the first few times, so not sure why he kept at it. 12 corners with a decent set-piece taker might have led to something, but with Garath we never threatened. McShane had a header where he had no one within 5 yards of him, yet was never going to score because of where he was and the speed the ball came to him. Get Swift in the team and get him on corners.
Yes Birmingham results-wise are a decent team and had won 3 on the bounce, but if you have near 75% possession, you should be winning matches, or at least creating chances and scoring goals. I'm not sure how much of a miss Joey was, but hopefully he'll be back for the weekend and we can test ourselves against the league's top scorers on Saturday
Maybe, just maybe, the team will develop and get better at turning possession into chances as they become more accustomed to this style of play.Dennis the Butler wrote:So 71% possession and the opposition still has more attempts on goal .. according to the BBC anyway .. I just don't get where this is leading, with or without another striker ..
I agree with Snowball. If we had better players and scored more goals then we'd be higher up the league.Maneki Neko wrote:stop forcing your dilusions on us you mentalSnowball wrote:So with a striker in hot form, we wouldn't be one point better off (the play-offs)CountryRoyal wrote:
Sorry, what?![]()
Just further compounding the notion that you are in fact mental.
or 2-3 points better off (14 points, one behind the automatics)?
?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], katweslowski, Ralf, WestYorksRoyal and 227 guests