Whilst I agree we need to win on Saturday it is amazing how expectations change isn't it. If we lose, slip to what 5th?Hound wrote:Obviously difficult to judge only from the highlights, but barely looked like Leeds had a chance bar the goal either. Pen was a joke, but suppose we've had some dodgy ones
Swift missing is starting to bite, esp with both Williams and Obita out. I much prefer the 3 5 2 to the 4 3 3, and Obita is pretty key to the first system.
Need to win vs Blackburn now really
http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/footb ... t-12315508Jaap Stam wrote:
I think we played very, very well. One of our best games.
You are not going to get 10 or 15 chances to score, but you are going to get a couple and you need to take them - especially if teams are playing like Leeds.
Second half maybe in the final third we could have done better with our decision making, in putting the ball in. We should have scored.
And we should have been sharper defending wise because if you lose the ball they are going to try and hit us on the counter attack - that’s what happened with the first goal.
Once you give that goal away it’s going to be more difficult because they can just drop in even more.
Towards the end you try to force it and still go forward to get the equaliser. But then at the end we should have had the throw-in, the referee didn’t make that decision and they got the penalty to make it 2-0.
I think in how we played and how we dominated, it was one of our best games.
Normally we dominate for one half or 60 minutes and then we get difficulties, but we did it for almost 90 minutes.
The only thing is sometimes our decision making in the final third we could have done better. We could have created a lot more. That’s what we need to be sharper in.
But also we needed to be aggressive in defending and not give them the chances in front of goal.
Yeah, I spotted that about a month ago.hughsies no.1 wrote:Game after game it is becoming more and more apparent how vitally important the first goal is with our new style of play. If we score first we will force the opposition into abandoning their gameplan to nulify the way we play, if we concede they can sit back and watch us struggle.
This made for an interesting read on the commute this morning - http://www.thecitytalking.com/leeds-uni ... s-to-town/
While our current style of play certainly emphasises and exacerbates this fact, our inability to come from behind is a problem that has plagued us since we were relegated last.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, I spotted that about a month ago.hughsies no.1 wrote:Game after game it is becoming more and more apparent how vitally important the first goal is with our new style of play. If we score first we will force the opposition into abandoning their gameplan to nulify the way we play, if we concede they can sit back and watch us struggle.
This made for an interesting read on the commute this morning - http://www.thecitytalking.com/leeds-uni ... s-to-town/
Our record when we take the lead in the first half is something like P9, W8, D1, L0. Our record when going down in the first half is similarly emphatic at something like P6, W0, D1, L5. I don't think we're a strong promotion contender, because we just can't rescue points where we don't get our noses in front early. But, we're still in the mix because we're good at getting in front and then amazing at staying there.
Kes, serious question, do you go to many Chelsea games?No Fixed Abode wrote:Shame the 150 away fans didn't spur Reading on to victory.
Who's "bantering"? I was asking a genuine question.genome wrote:Bantering about attendances
Isn't that for teenagers, Twitter armchairs and Brighton fans?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 109 guests