Not bloody likely.moo wrote:The real highlights were being told to sit down every 10 seconds from daytrippers.. in the singing section.
I think it was Ian Royal and his mum.
Not bloody likely.moo wrote:The real highlights were being told to sit down every 10 seconds from daytrippers.. in the singing section.
I think it was Ian Royal and his mum.

Except when they missed from 2 yards in the 9th min?The Informant wrote:Never once looked like we wanted to win it. No enterprise and no flair. Huddersfield deserved it even though they too had no clear sight of goal.
Stam has done a great job even though it's dull as oxf*rd to watch. We let our selves down today though. We should have had a go at them. We played not to lose in a play off final.
Well done on the season though lads. Spend a bit in the summer and I have us going up next season.
I take it you were in the bog when Swift took his shot then?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:oldebiscuit wrote: I don't think some of you lot understand this game of football. Both teams play a similar style with the only difference being that we play it around at the back and Huddersfield play it at the front, so it was always going to be tight and there was never going to be many, if any goals. The reason Huddersfield had a few chances is because they are a GOOD TEAM. They didn't happen to just stumble into the playoffs, they actually earned it.
If you guys want perfection then you had best fcuk off to Stamford Bridge where it is probably as good as it gets.
Now we have just had a season which surpassed all expectations and ended up at Wembley. Hopefully it can be carried into next season, and i for one think that it will.
Yes, it was disappointing, but please, please, please, all you whingers, get a grip.Bore off mate, fully entitled to be find it frustrating watching the 3rd place team fail to have a proper shot at goal in 120 min of football.
So Swift's shot in the 48th minute wasn't a clear cut chance? (he should have done better). Gunter's header from McCleary's cross wasn't a clear cut chance? (he should have done better).alfie9 wrote:If you don't create a single clear cut chance in 120 minutes, you don't deserve to be a Premier League club. Period
We were woeful, the setup was far too negative. Hopefully the new investors saw enough of Williams today to invest in keeping him here. One of the few players that gave 110%.
We'll win the league next season. RTID
Bob1871 wrote:We lacked width. We've played well all year with two wide wingers and today struggled to do anything with the ball untik G Mac came on and we pushed Obita in to more of a LW position.
The ref completely bottled sending their number 6 off (Hogg I think?). He had been booked in the first half, bought down Williams as he was breaking through on the centre circle and then G mac down in the corner. Either challenge would have normally been a yellow.
Swift had a shocker and needs to do some serious gym work over the summer to get stronger as he's pushed off the ball far to easily.
As always at Wembley a disappointing atmosphere. It's hard to get it going when the usual singers are split and all over the place and day trippers not knowing the words.
Would prefer that, if it is still level after 120 mins, that the team with the most shots on target win. Encourages attacking play throughout the whole 120 mins. Have a shot count shown on the scoreboard so everyone knows what the count is. Wouldn't reward the negative set up by both teams yesterday.tmesis wrote:Then you've been wrong for 30 years then.Sutekh wrote: I've said for 30 years plus that penalties is a stupid way to decide any game, largely falling down to complete luck and next to no skill.
There is luck involved, but a good penalty is one that'll go in even if the keeper goes the right way. That is entirely about skill.
Mind you, I do agree no play-off final should go to penalties. If it's level after 120 minutes, the highest placed team should win.
Wouldn't work.NeilD wrote:Would prefer that, if it is still level after 120 mins, that the team with the most shots on target win. Encourages attacking play throughout the whole 120 mins. Have a shot count shown on the scoreboard so everyone knows what the count is. Wouldn't reward the negative set up by both teams yesterday.tmesis wrote:Then you've been wrong for 30 years then.Sutekh wrote: I've said for 30 years plus that penalties is a stupid way to decide any game, largely falling down to complete luck and next to no skill.
There is luck involved, but a good penalty is one that'll go in even if the keeper goes the right way. That is entirely about skill.
Mind you, I do agree no play-off final should go to penalties. If it's level after 120 minutes, the highest placed team should win.
00/01 lost play off finalSilver Fox wrote:04/05 last day disappointment
05/06 promoted as champions
10/11 last day disappointment
11/12 promoted as champions
16/17 last day disappointment
17/18 ???????????????