Whatever makes them feel better.Hound wrote:urgh, was looking for the Cook quotes and came across this from their local journo:
But one of the worst penalty decisions in living memory - the worst since Dan Burn was penalised for a clean tackle *outside* the box three seasons ago - turned the game on its head
Genuine wtf to that
I don’t think it’s the stick on that you and others are saying but it’s certainly no where near the extent to which they’re groaning about either. Weird peopleHound wrote:urgh, was looking for the Cook quotes and came across this from their local journo:
But one of the worst penalty decisions in living memory - the worst since Dan Burn was penalised for a clean tackle *outside* the box three seasons ago - turned the game on its head
Genuine wtf to that
Sorry who is DD?.Old Man Andrews wrote:That is a confirmed DD back up account BTW folks
Which is why there are advantages and disadvantagesLower West wrote:In the stadium easier to see what players aren't doing.........URZZZZ wrote:
There are advantages to watching it at home, there are advantages to watching it from the stadium
Or if you are near blind, like me, the stadium offers 0 optical advantages. I really struggled with the shape vs Brentford because of the camera angle in their stadium.Snowflake Royal wrote:Which is why there are advantages and disadvantagesLower West wrote:In the stadium easier to see what players aren't doing.........URZZZZ wrote:
There are advantages to watching it at home, there are advantages to watching it from the stadium
Live is absolutely more fun, and it's better for off the ball and shape.
Screen is easier and better for individual incidents, on the ball and replays.
All you need to know about Bristol Paul is that he dismissed my view without reading it because he assumed I hadn't attended. It speaks volumes about him tbh.
I struggle telling players apart at the stadium sometimes. I can't read the names, struggle with the numbers so I'm going on rough position, hair, skin colour, gait and body shape mostly.NewCorkSeth wrote:Or if you are near blind, like me, the stadium offers 0 optical advantages. I really struggled with the shape vs Brentford because of the camera angle in their stadium.Snowflake Royal wrote:Which is why there are advantages and disadvantagesLower West wrote:
In the stadium easier to see what players aren't doing.........
Live is absolutely more fun, and it's better for off the ball and shape.
Screen is easier and better for individual incidents, on the ball and replays.
All you need to know about Bristol Paul is that he dismissed my view without reading it because he assumed I hadn't attended. It speaks volumes about him tbh.
Similar to what Pepe does but he judges solely on how juicy their asses are. Impressive really.Snowflake Royal wrote:I struggle telling players apart at the stadium sometimes. I can't read the names, struggle with the numbers so I'm going on rough position, hair, skin colour, gait and body shape mostly.NewCorkSeth wrote:Or if you are near blind, like me, the stadium offers 0 optical advantages. I really struggled with the shape vs Brentford because of the camera angle in their stadium.Snowflake Royal wrote: Which is why there are advantages and disadvantages
Live is absolutely more fun, and it's better for off the ball and shape.
Screen is easier and better for individual incidents, on the ball and replays.
All you need to know about Bristol Paul is that he dismissed my view without reading it because he assumed I hadn't attended. It speaks volumes about him tbh.
Also depends where you sit, end on and you've got piss all idea what's really happening at the other end.
Much easier on screen.
Search results show zero members, zero posts with that user name?.From Despair To Where? wrote:Someone you aspire to be.
Think it was short for Double-ended Dildo. Try that.karbota wrote:Search results show zero members, zero posts with that user name?.From Despair To Where? wrote:Someone you aspire to be.
NewCorkSeth wrote:Similar to what Pepe does but he judges solely on how juicy their asses are. Impressive really.Snowflake Royal wrote:I struggle telling players apart at the stadium sometimes. I can't read the names, struggle with the numbers so I'm going on rough position, hair, skin colour, gait and body shape mostly.NewCorkSeth wrote: Or if you are near blind, like me, the stadium offers 0 optical advantages. I really struggled with the shape vs Brentford because of the camera angle in their stadium.
Also depends where you sit, end on and you've got piss all idea what's really happening at the other end.
Much easier on screen.
So a complete nobody then.karbota wrote:Search results show zero members, zero posts with that user name?.From Despair To Where? wrote:Someone you aspire to be.
No, I thought they might be arguing that too, so I listened to the interview again. The reporter clearly says 'he was too close for it to be given as a penalty' - no reference at all to the arm/hand being tucked into the body or not away from the body. Furthermore, even if that had been their argument, we have already seen numerous handballs awarded across the leagues when a player's hand/arm has been similarly positioned. I don't like the new laws (and I think it ludicrous that the twat Elleray still states that their intent was to avoid defenders having to defend with their hands behind their backs when it's had the complete opposite effect) but under those laws it was a clear penalty. And if the ref hadn't awarded it for that, he would still have been justified in awarding it for the defender wiping out Boye immediately after the ball touched his hand!NewCorkSeth wrote:I'm a bit rusty but I think they are arguing his hand was in a natural position down by his side which the new law stipulates to be acceptable (I dont know why it is as context is important) but I still think it's a pen. Not even a pen I would be argue shouldnt be given if it was the other way around.RoyalBlue wrote:Yep, the Sky Sports reporter interviewing Cook after the game was bleating on about the fact that it shouldn't have been a penalty because the defender was so close to Boye when the ball hit his hand. That's totally unacceptable from someone who is paid to do a professional job. The lazy sod clearly hasn't even bothered to read the new laws and guidance. They clearly state distance is no longer a factor to take into account.From Despair To Where? wrote:Half our team immediately appealed for handball.
Don't think the defender got the ball after he handled it. He wiped Boye out as the ball rolled out of play untouched. Under the current interpretation of handball, it was a clear penalty which is where the EFL pundits get confused because they don't understand the current interpretation.
.The above offences apply even if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is close.
Conversely, full credit to our owners for managing to sort things to the extent that we can have a squad with a depth of really high quality players that is the envy of other managers in our league.From Despair To Where? wrote:And if Cook is moaning about the quality of player on our bench then maybe he should be reminded that he manages a club that stayed in the Premiership for nigh on 10 years and won an FA Cup on the strength of buying England internationals on crowds of 11,000 in the Premiership.
In fairness, those England internationals were Chris Kirkland and Emile Heskey.From Despair To Where? wrote:And if Cook is moaning about the quality of player on our bench then maybe he should be reminded that he manages a club that stayed in the Premiership for nigh on 10 years and won an FA Cup on the strength of buying England internationals on crowds of 11,000 in the Premiership.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Horsham Royal, rabidbee, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 88 guests