Yep I know. But by protecting the grandparents (supposedly - not sure how true that would be in reality) it could cause massive knock on effects to the kidsStranded wrote:School closures aren't to protect the kids really, more reduce the chance of them spreading it to, say, their grandparents.
sandman wrote:Wish some people would understand that this is NOT oxf*rd "scaremongering".
This is real, it is dangerous for us all and it is only going to get worse.
One87One wrote:90,000 die every year from the Flu, but please do keep buying into the fear-mongering being peddled left and right.Snowball wrote:Wow
Uk deaths jump from 11 to 21 in a single day
Interesting thanksmarlowuk wrote:Yes! With thanks to the meerkats!2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Anyone going to the cinema anymore?
Numbers are very much reduced so it's easy to avoid close contact with individuals. Plenty of room in the screens themselves so you can sit where you like away from others and, dare I say it, in the premium seats! My wife and I went earlier this week and have planned to go again next week. My wife is Type 1 diabetic so may not risk it though!
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51873519SpaghettiHoop wrote:Has anyone considered the effect on FFP of the virus and shutdown? Many clubs will post losses which are not the consequence of bad financial management. What if they exceed the £39 million loss threshold?
Will the EFL punish owners for funding these losses?
And 2 million could die of this.One87One wrote:90,000 die every year from the Flu, but please do keep buying into the fear-mongering being peddled left and right.Snowball wrote:Wow
Uk deaths jump from 11 to 21 in a single day
Eases the ultimate pressure on public serviceselrey wrote:And 2 million could die of this.One87One wrote:90,000 die every year from the Flu, but please do keep buying into the fear-mongering being peddled left and right.Snowball wrote:Wow
Uk deaths jump from 11 to 21 in a single day
At 6% or 7% as Wuhan and Italy have seen, and 60% get it, like Boris wants, that's 2 million dead.
The government say it is their intent to go for herd-immunity. That is 60% or more of the population to get it.elrey wrote:And 2 million could die of this.One87One wrote:90,000 die every year from the Flu, but please do keep buying into the fear-mongering being peddled left and right.Snowball wrote:Wow
Uk deaths jump from 11 to 21 in a single day
At 6% or 7% as Wuhan and Italy have seen, and 60% get it, like Boris wants, that's 2 million dead.
Hound wrote:Of course with the herd-immunity the point is that 60% people who are very low risk get it. So it won’t be anything like 1% death rate that it would be for the entire population
Whether it works out like that is a different matter of course
+1, there's a massive thread on AE about it, we don't need another one here.Nameless wrote:Sorry, but this is becoming utterly counter productive and this thread is now officially off limits.
Guessing at numbers and outcomes by those with no actual knowledge doesn’t help.
Extrapolating using an obvious preexisting bias doesn’t help.
I can understand that it could get bad but I reckon some people are talking themselves into a breakdown, which helps no one.
I’m going to do sensible stuff to keep me and my family as safe as possible, with the add on that that will also help the wider community.
But constantly calculating and publishing guesses about death rates to several decimal places is not what I want to read several times a day.
Hopefully we can all get back to talking football on this football forum when the new season starts.
I hope everyone stays healthy and we don’t see the worst outcomes some are suggesting are inevitable.
In the meantime for the sake of my sanity as much as anything I’m going to isolate myself from this thread.
Google what herd immunity is, it means the herd protects the vulnerable, not that it kills them.Snowball wrote:Hound wrote:Of course with the herd-immunity the point is that 60% people who are very low risk get it. So it won’t be anything like 1% death rate that it would be for the entire population
Whether it works out like that is a different matter of course
Understood, but what happens when the OAPs emerge from their
3-4-5 month isolation? Whichever way they turn "he" (or she) is
probably carrying the virus! Would it be OAP Armageddon with
a sudden upsurge of cases but 99% of them over 70s?
I'm not saying what is or isn't the case, just trying to understand.
Herd immunity (also called herd effect, community immunity, population immunity, or social immunity) is a form of indirect protection from infectious disease that occurs when a large percentage of a population has become immune to an infection, thereby providing a measure of protection for individuals who are not immune
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 785 guests