Could only buy snacks and non-alcoholic drinks outside the stadium, nothing was open inside.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:How was it for those who went? Concourses open? Beer? Sounded good on TV.
Could only buy snacks and non-alcoholic drinks outside the stadium, nothing was open inside.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:How was it for those who went? Concourses open? Beer? Sounded good on TV.
Wouldn't that involve changing the turnstile tech though? Or do the paper tickets use barcodes... I've never had one, thought I heard they used the tags tooLower West wrote:Barcode readerSnowflake Royal wrote:How do you get an RFID tag in an e-ticket? Pretty sure the turnstiles run on that sort of system.Green wrote: Is there no e-ticket option?
This all sounds very 2006.
Barcodes on the paper tickets Ian. It was pretty straight forward although there was a long queue outside gate 8 before kick off but we got to our seats in time.Snowflake Royal wrote:Wouldn't that involve changing the turnstile tech though? Or do the paper tickets use barcodes... I've never had one, thought I heard they used the tags tooLower West wrote:Barcode readerSnowflake Royal wrote: How do you get an RFID tag in an e-ticket? Pretty sure the turnstiles run on that sort of system.
Thoroughly enjoyed it. It felt a lot busier than 2000 people. A surprising array of food stalls too.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:How was it for those who went? Concourses open? Beer? Sounded good on TV.
Fair enough. That makes sense. E ticket would be easy then.Zip wrote:Barcodes on the paper tickets Ian. It was pretty straight forward although there was a long queue outside gate 8 before kick off but we got to our seats in time.Snowflake Royal wrote:Wouldn't that involve changing the turnstile tech though? Or do the paper tickets use barcodes... I've never had one, thought I heard they used the tags tooLower West wrote:
Barcode reader
There were a higher number of people than usual who were unable to get through the turnstile. A steward was there though to sort it all out.Snowflake Royal wrote:Fair enough. That makes sense. E ticket would be easy then.Zip wrote:Barcodes on the paper tickets Ian. It was pretty straight forward although there was a long queue outside gate 8 before kick off but we got to our seats in time.Snowflake Royal wrote: Wouldn't that involve changing the turnstile tech though? Or do the paper tickets use barcodes... I've never had one, thought I heard they used the tags too
Great to hear! Certainly sounded more than 2000.Zip wrote:Thoroughly enjoyed it. It felt a lot busier than 2000 people. A surprising array of food stalls too.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:How was it for those who went? Concourses open? Beer? Sounded good on TV.
Would not hesitate to return.It felt safe.
Fair comment about the lack of social distancing. I certainly felt within one metre of those in front and to the side of me. It would perhaps have been better to have had the West Stand open too and had 1000 fans in each stand. Having said that it didn’t feel unsafe to me.DelBoyRodders wrote:It was great to see and hear the fans back on Saturday and brought a tear to my eye when the players entered the pitch from the tunnel - long overdue.
Admittedly it looked great for TV to see all the fans in the East Stand cheering, singing etc, butconsidering the (lack of) social distancing, it looks as if Donald Trump came up with the seating plan.
The whole point of allowing just 2000 fans back at this stage was so they could be spread out around the stadium - then hopefully more allowed as the weeks pass as infection levels hopefully drop. Just take a look at West Ham's seating arrangement for their TV game on Saturday.
I certainly won't be rushing back anytime soon and considering how slow tickets are selling for games many others must feel the same.
The West Stand is kept as a secure area for players and officials so no way would they put fans within touching distance either in the seats or on the way in.Zip wrote:Fair comment about the lack of social distancing. I certainly felt within one metre of those in front and to the side of me. It would perhaps have been better to have had the West Stand open too and had 1000 fans in each stand. Having said that it didn’t feel unsafe to me.DelBoyRodders wrote:It was great to see and hear the fans back on Saturday and brought a tear to my eye when the players entered the pitch from the tunnel - long overdue.
Admittedly it looked great for TV to see all the fans in the East Stand cheering, singing etc, butconsidering the (lack of) social distancing, it looks as if Donald Trump came up with the seating plan.
The whole point of allowing just 2000 fans back at this stage was so they could be spread out around the stadium - then hopefully more allowed as the weeks pass as infection levels hopefully drop. Just take a look at West Ham's seating arrangement for their TV game on Saturday.
I certainly won't be rushing back anytime soon and considering how slow tickets are selling for games many others must feel the same.
What were West Berks brewery selling on the day?tidus_mi2 wrote:Could only buy snacks and non-alcoholic drinks outside the stadium, nothing was open inside.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:How was it for those who went? Concourses open? Beer? Sounded good on TV.
Club cannot sell tickets to anybody in Tier 3. This will block supporters travelling from Slough for example.DelBoyRodders wrote: I certainly won't be rushing back anytime soon and considering how slow tickets are selling for games many others must feel the same.
The benefit of the East Stand is the secure outside space which means the concourses don’t get full of people. The other stands don’t have that.Snowflake Royal wrote:2000 in an 8000 capacity stand seems about as spread out as you can manage without having to significantly increase your costs by opening and staffing a second or third stand...
Certainly looked pretty well spread out on the TV.
You wouldn't really be practically any more spread out with a 1000 in each end - they're 4000 capacity, right? So smaller number of people in a smaller area means just as close to the people who are near you and you've no need to worry about anyone further than those, be they a 5 metres away or the length of the stadium. I imagine it's a similar deal with the West Upper and Lower, but you're not a stadium away, just at a different level.
Yeah, think you already said about the West.Nameless wrote:The benefit of the East Stand is the secure outside space which means the concourses don’t get full of people. The other stands don’t have that.Snowflake Royal wrote:2000 in an 8000 capacity stand seems about as spread out as you can manage without having to significantly increase your costs by opening and staffing a second or third stand...
Certainly looked pretty well spread out on the TV.
You wouldn't really be practically any more spread out with a 1000 in each end - they're 4000 capacity, right? So smaller number of people in a smaller area means just as close to the people who are near you and you've no need to worry about anyone further than those, be they a 5 metres away or the length of the stadium. I imagine it's a similar deal with the West Upper and Lower, but you're not a stadium away, just at a different level.
The West is simply not an option because it is kept secure for player and staff protection..
DelBoyRodders wrote:It was great to see and hear the fans back on Saturday and brought a tear to my eye when the players entered the pitch from the tunnel - long overdue.
Admittedly it looked great for TV to see all the fans in the East Stand cheering, singing etc, butconsidering the (lack of) social distancing, it looks as if Donald Trump came up with the seating plan.
The whole point of allowing just 2000 fans back at this stage was so they could be spread out around the stadium - then hopefully more allowed as the weeks pass as infection levels hopefully drop. Just take a look at West Ham's seating arrangement for their TV game on Saturday.
I certainly won't be rushing back anytime soon and considering how slow tickets are selling for games many others must feel the same.
I really didn’t feel the seating was an issue.bloody Volvo driver wrote:DelBoyRodders wrote:It was great to see and hear the fans back on Saturday and brought a tear to my eye when the players entered the pitch from the tunnel - long overdue.
Admittedly it looked great for TV to see all the fans in the East Stand cheering, singing etc, butconsidering the (lack of) social distancing, it looks as if Donald Trump came up with the seating plan.
The whole point of allowing just 2000 fans back at this stage was so they could be spread out around the stadium - then hopefully more allowed as the weeks pass as infection levels hopefully drop. Just take a look at West Ham's seating arrangement for their TV game on Saturday.
I certainly won't be rushing back anytime soon and considering how slow tickets are selling for games many others must feel the same.
And Brighton - 3 seats between supporters
And Millwall - 3 stands open
And Watford - 2 stands open
There are no acceptable excuses about cost, access etc that doesn’t outweigh the current need for social distancing when they could. 1,000 fans in the East Stand and 500 in the ends would be infinitely more socially distanced than shoe horning 2,000 fans into half a stand.
I am actually surprised there hasn’t been more said about it, I thought it was shocking for a club which on the wholly goes out of its way to please fans to think their seating plan was a good idea.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests