Fair points on the face of it but those Blackpool goals were coming all game. They could easily have scored two in the first half.Millsy wrote:Is it coincidence that yet again Puscas goes off and we concede?+-
He seems to play as a defensive forward - constantly chasing down every ball, harassing the defenders, the keeper, works his socks off. He might not've physically scored the first but it was basically 99% his goal, as he pressurised their back line and keeper and won the ball. Giving them something to think about all game. And he almost scored himself later by pressurising the back line.
Take him off for a floaty young winger who doesn't press as much and as we have seen before the opposition is delighted! They play with no fear anymore and can just all push forward.
I dunno, but it does seem quite odd to me how the game changes so much when he goes off.
Made the 2nd tbf, could have been selfish and shot after winning it back. Laid it off to Laurent who slotted Tom DeleURZZZZ wrote:Isn’t this exactly what Baldock was getting criticised for on a weekly basis last season (including yourself)? Running around, movement in behind but not being found and not really contributing overall. That’s now 800 minutes of football this season and 0 goalsZip wrote:Also agree with others about Puscas. The amount of times he was making a run tonight which was totally wasted as our players refused to play the ball early.
Coincidence - yesterday absolutely. Their opener came from a lucky corner, a half clearance and a deflection off Dann's head. Taking Puscas off had no effect on that at all. Tide had already well and truly turned toward Blackpool before the goal any way.Millsy wrote:Is it coincidence that yet again Puscas goes off and we concede?+-
He seems to play as a defensive forward - constantly chasing down every ball, harassing the defenders, the keeper, works his socks off. He might not've physically scored the first but it was basically 99% his goal, as he pressurised their back line and keeper and won the ball. Giving them something to think about all game. And he almost scored himself later by pressurising the back line.
Take him off for a floaty young winger who doesn't press as much and as we have seen before the opposition is delighted! They play with no fear anymore and can just all push forward.
I dunno, but it does seem quite odd to me how the game changes so much when he goes off.
For all 3 goals? Tide was always generally with Blackpool yes, we were shite, but we shipped 3 straight after he went off. How did they get that corner? By bombarding us. A goal seemed inevitable. Thats' my point. Just generally weaker, inviting attacks and corners etcStranded wrote:Coincidence - yesterday absolutely. Their opener came from a lucky corner, a half clearance and a deflection off Dann's head. Taking Puscas off had no effect on that at all. Tide had already well and truly turned toward Blackpool before the goal any way.Millsy wrote:Is it coincidence that yet again Puscas goes off and we concede?+-
He seems to play as a defensive forward - constantly chasing down every ball, harassing the defenders, the keeper, works his socks off. He might not've physically scored the first but it was basically 99% his goal, as he pressurised their back line and keeper and won the ball. Giving them something to think about all game. And he almost scored himself later by pressurising the back line.
Take him off for a floaty young winger who doesn't press as much and as we have seen before the opposition is delighted! They play with no fear anymore and can just all push forward.
I dunno, but it does seem quite odd to me how the game changes so much when he goes off.
Not seen it anywhere but guessing at around 11,000 ish. More Blackpool fans than there were Barnsley but less hone fans than on Saturday.karbota wrote:What was the attendance?, apologise if this has already been mentioned elsewhere.
Surprised at 11K looked more like under 10k on the tv, the weather and being a mid week game were factors but i think many thousands of fans are not returning because of the political gesture of taking the BLM knee. Good to see Puscas and others now refusing.Zip wrote:Not seen it anywhere but guessing at around 11,000 ish. More Blackpool fans than there were Barnsley but less hone fans than on Saturday.karbota wrote:What was the attendance?, apologise if this has already been mentioned elsewhere.
Thank goodness for the BLM movement!karbota wrote:I won't be returning to the Mad Stad until this nonsense stops.Zip wrote:Not seen it anywhere but guessing at around 11,000 ish. More Blackpool fans than there were Barnsley but less hone fans than on Saturday.karbota wrote:What was the attendance?, apologise if this has already been mentioned elsewhere.
windermereROYAL wrote:Blackpool were sent out for the 2nd half a good 3 minutes before us, obvious got a right bollocking, should have seen it coming really.
NathStPaul wrote:Thank goodness for the BLM movement!karbota wrote:I won't be returning to the Mad Stad until this nonsense stops.Zip wrote:
Not seen it anywhere but guessing at around 11,000 ish. More Blackpool fans than there were Barnsley but less hone fans than on Saturday.
I make it to be 1 pass to play him through...... in 4 games now!!! I will defend him as he is definitely making the runs a lone striker should be making.He is absolutely wasted + wasting his time. He may as well just join in the midfielders 45yard sideways passing, from last nights showing doesn't really matter if they come off or not these days.Hound wrote:that Puscas chance is really how we should be playing for him. It was utterly simple, but he made an excellent run, and had the pace and strength to get in behind.
Shame that was about the only time we tried it all night
I do not believe in a god so why would I thank one?Pat Butchers Ring wrote:NathStPaul wrote:Thank goodness for the BLM movement!karbota wrote:
I won't be returning to the Mad Stad until this nonsense stops.
Why are you thanking goodness?
Yep my point above - Puscas adds things we don't see and we seem to mysteriously lose shape when he goes. The sort of player you miss when he goes. Chases everything.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:I make it to be 1 pass to play him through...... in 4 games now!!! I will defend him as he is definitely making the runs a lone striker should be making.He is absolutely wasted + wasting his time. He may as well just join in the midfielders 45yard sideways passing, from last nights showing doesn't really matter if they come off or not these days.Hound wrote:that Puscas chance is really how we should be playing for him. It was utterly simple, but he made an excellent run, and had the pace and strength to get in behind.
Shame that was about the only time we tried it all night
Azeez was totally the wrong sub at the wrong time. I know we are not blessed with options right now but as soon as he went off we completely lost what ever shape we had and it was fully taken advantage of.
Bit of a long way for you to come from Australia anyway isn't it, Semtex?karbota wrote:I won't be returning to the Mad Stad until this nonsense stops.Zip wrote:Not seen it anywhere but guessing at around 11,000 ish. More Blackpool fans than there were Barnsley but less hone fans than on Saturday.karbota wrote:What was the attendance?, apologise if this has already been mentioned elsewhere.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Dirk Gently, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 94 guests