CheLOLsea

9655 posts
User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 41380
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: Vote Biscuit

Re: CheLOLsea

by Winston Biscuit » 11 Sep 2025 20:02

Chelsea charged with 74 breaches of rules relating to the use of football agents.

Thoughts with Kes, and Bubble from Big Brother series 2 at this difficult time

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24844
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: CheLOLsea

by Sutekh » 11 Sep 2025 23:18

Winston Biscuit wrote:Chelsea charged with 74 breaches of rules relating to the use of football agents.

Thoughts with Kes, and Bubble from Big Brother series 2 at this difficult time
They’re expecting to receive a financial penalty and not a sporting sanction even though it’s through the use of agents you get players.

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7835
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: CheLOLsea

by BRO_BOT » 13 Sep 2025 21:54

Their new sub lost his man there

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26031
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: CheLOLsea

by AthleticoSpizz » 13 Sep 2025 22:02

Sutekh wrote:
Winston Biscuit wrote:Chelsea charged with 74 breaches of rules relating to the use of football agents.

Thoughts with Kes, and Bubble from Big Brother series 2 at this difficult time
They’re expecting to receive a financial penalty and not a sporting sanction even though it’s through the use of agents you get players.
and for Premierdonnaship clubs like Chelsea, Citeh, Utd etc etc, a fine is no punishment at all….it’s just money….it’s nothing

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 41380
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: Vote Biscuit

Re: CheLOLsea

by Winston Biscuit » 16 Sep 2025 22:38

Sutekh wrote:
Winston Biscuit wrote:Chelsea charged with 74 breaches of rules relating to the use of football agents.

Thoughts with Kes, and Bubble from Big Brother series 2 at this difficult time
They’re expecting to receive a financial penalty and not a sporting sanction even though it’s through the use of agents you get players.
FFP specialist on Talksport today said its Chelsea that have briefing the media that a financial penalty is all thats expected, but he said his understanding is the authorities are looking to hit them with a sporting penalty (possible points deduction and transfer ban)

Also said the 74 breaches includes more dodgy shenanigans that were uncovered since they reported themselves, and were not included in the initial report on themselves

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24844
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: CheLOLsea

by Sutekh » 17 Sep 2025 09:41

Winston Biscuit wrote:
Sutekh wrote:
Winston Biscuit wrote:Chelsea charged with 74 breaches of rules relating to the use of football agents.

Thoughts with Kes, and Bubble from Big Brother series 2 at this difficult time
They’re expecting to receive a financial penalty and not a sporting sanction even though it’s through the use of agents you get players.
FFP specialist on Talksport today said its Chelsea that have briefing the media that a financial penalty is all thats expected, but he said his understanding is the authorities are looking to hit them with a sporting penalty (possible points deduction and transfer ban)

Also said the 74 breaches includes more dodgy shenanigans that were uncovered since they reported themselves, and were not included in the initial report on themselves
Sounds like there could be another payout for lawyers on the way. :roll:

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7835
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: CheLOLsea

by BRO_BOT » 20 Sep 2025 18:11

Are the Chelsea keepers on loan from Utd? :?

They have been absolute dogshit!

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 41380
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: Vote Biscuit

Re: CheLOLsea

by Winston Biscuit » 16 Mar 2026 13:23

Suspended transfer ban and £10.75m fine for breaching Premier League rules over financial reporting, third-party investment and youth development.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... e-breaking

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 28524
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: CheLOLsea

by Sanguine » 16 Mar 2026 14:34

Winston Biscuit wrote:Suspended transfer ban and £10.75m fine for breaching Premier League rules over financial reporting, third-party investment and youth development.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... e-breaking
But of a joke really. I remain convinced that anyone waiting for City to get a harsh punishment for their 'irregularities' is going to be waiting a long time.

Chelsea hid £47m of payments to players, agents and 'other third parties'. The payments covered the signing of half a first team, including David Luiz, Samuel Eto'o, Eden Hazard, Nemanja Matic and Andre Schurrle. And they get a suspended ban and a small (relative to their worth) fine?

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 41380
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: Vote Biscuit

Re: CheLOLsea

by Winston Biscuit » 16 Mar 2026 14:47

Sanguine wrote:
Winston Biscuit wrote:Suspended transfer ban and £10.75m fine for breaching Premier League rules over financial reporting, third-party investment and youth development.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... e-breaking
But of a joke really. I remain convinced that anyone waiting for City to get a harsh punishment for their 'irregularities' is going to be waiting a long time.

Chelsea hid £47m of payments to players, agents and 'other third parties'. The payments covered the signing of half a first team, including David Luiz, Samuel Eto'o, Eden Hazard, Nemanja Matic and Andre Schurrle. And they get a suspended ban and a small (relative to their worth) fine?
when weighing up whether a punishment for something is fair or not, I often flip it around and think 'would the guilty party have happily taken this punishment as a forfeit up front, if they were then able to get away with the wrongdoing?' and the answer is clearly yes, and therefore the punishment is not strong enough.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24844
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: CheLOLsea

by Sutekh » 16 Mar 2026 16:10

Winston Biscuit wrote:
Sanguine wrote:
Winston Biscuit wrote:Suspended transfer ban and £10.75m fine for breaching Premier League rules over financial reporting, third-party investment and youth development.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... e-breaking
But of a joke really. I remain convinced that anyone waiting for City to get a harsh punishment for their 'irregularities' is going to be waiting a long time.

Chelsea hid £47m of payments to players, agents and 'other third parties'. The payments covered the signing of half a first team, including David Luiz, Samuel Eto'o, Eden Hazard, Nemanja Matic and Andre Schurrle. And they get a suspended ban and a small (relative to their worth) fine?
when weighing up whether a punishment for something is fair or not, I often flip it around and think 'would the guilty party have happily taken this punishment as a forfeit up front, if they were then able to get away with the wrongdoing?' and the answer is clearly yes, and therefore the punishment is not strong enough.
Yes, looking forward to FC 115 being told “move along, nothing to see here” when they finally get to the end of it all at some point in the next couple of decades. Presume the whole affair has gone to VAR now, thus the delay.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26031
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: CheLOLsea

by AthleticoSpizz » 16 Mar 2026 19:50

It’s only money, no points deductions thanks to them ‘holding their hands up’

EFL teams get to admit lots of shortcomings……and they get fines, embargoes……and the points deductions

It’s all bullsh1t, football’s dead 115

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9289
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: CheLOLsea

by windermereROYAL » 17 Mar 2026 08:43

Seething, they`ve basically cheated their way to 2 league titles the champions league a fa and league cup off the back of 74 misconduct charges in that 8 year time frame and got a slap on the wrist while Everton Forest and Leicester all suffered point deductions for lesser offences.
When you know who your mates are.

They just can`t sit on their hands for too much longer regarding city, but if this verdict is anything to go by, there`s going to be plenty of outrage when the verdict is finally delivered.

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 28524
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: CheLOLsea

by Sanguine » 17 Mar 2026 08:59

AthleticoSpizz wrote:It’s only money, no points deductions thanks to them ‘holding their hands up’

EFL teams get to admit lots of shortcomings……and they get fines, embargoes……and the points deductions

It’s all bullsh1t, football’s dead 115
By way of comparison, Luton Town were deducted ten points a decade ago for *check notes* making irrregular payments to agents.

It stinks, it all stinks.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33509
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: CheLOLsea

by leon » 17 Mar 2026 09:04

money corrupts everything it touches newsflash

9655 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 110 guests

It is currently 18 Mar 2026 17:32