Didn't help in the other two instances did it?6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑20 May 2026 16:22
They wouldn't be doing it at all if there was nothing to gain from it.
This isn't hard to understand. The penalty for league fixtures was 2 points for each proven offence. You cannot deduct 2 points for a knock out tie, so the only remaining sporting sanction is to let the other team through at their expense.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑20 May 2026 22:23Didn't help in the other two instances did it?6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑20 May 2026 16:22
They wouldn't be doing it at all if there was nothing to gain from it.
I do also find it confusing that the exact same offense, by the exact same team, gets different penalties at the same time. i.e. punishment for doing it against Ipswich/Oxford & Middlesbrough
It’s crazy and in this day and age everyone has so much access to clips, matches, data etc it’s not like decades ago.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑20 May 2026 16:15I still don't get advantage in all this ...... they lost those Ipswich & Oxford games.SouthDownsRoyal wrote: ↑20 May 2026 09:14 If they have admitted spying on Oxford and Ipswich it won’t end there.
Why would they spy on just two random teams during a whole season pre playoffs?
It's not like NFL or something where teams can rehearse certain plays, Football teams don't even really change their style game to game
That's a really interesting point and I thought this last night. The players are professional sportsman, they are offered contracts and their acceptance is based on their ambition to get to a certain, or to achieve something, to earn bonus for scoring, promotion, etc.

So you've only gained an unfair advantage if you win as a result?John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑20 May 2026 22:23Didn't help in the other two instances did it?6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑20 May 2026 16:22
They wouldn't be doing it at all if there was nothing to gain from it.
Yeah, the grey area is of course the fact that they would have to have won on Saturday to trigger any and all promotion releated bonuses/pay rises but the actions of the club have taken that opportunity away - also the trust between them as employees and their employer has now been broken. There is absolutely no way they can start next season with Eckert in charge.katweslowski wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:04That's a really interesting point and I thought this last night. The players are professional sportsman, they are offered contracts and their acceptance is based on their ambition to get to a certain, or to achieve something, to earn bonus for scoring, promotion, etc.
So it's a commercial deal and quite understandably they have both their financial interests in mind, as well as their sporting ambitions.
Like you say, they all woudl have worked hard all season and in the play offs to get to the final, and quite possibly would have gone up. That would have likely triggered a bonus, increase in wages, ability to renegotiate, even to move to another club - at the very least a ton of extra money, exposure, advertising deals, opportunities, etc.
Now they're "stuck" back in the Championship, back to square one and none of if is their fault. Their employer royally fecked up.
I would be amazed if they don't have some kind of legal argument here to claim losses of some kind.
You've just not used it,Royal Rother wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:31So you've only gained an unfair advantage if you win as a result?John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑20 May 2026 22:23Didn't help in the other two instances did it?6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑20 May 2026 16:22
They wouldn't be doing it at all if there was nothing to gain from it.
They all took a 40% pay cut for this season, on the understanding that if they went up they'd go back to previous, PL, wage levels. So I don't doubt that a good number of them are on the phone to their agents right now, and that those agents will soon be on the phone to their lawyers.katweslowski wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:04That's a really interesting point and I thought this last night. The players are professional sportsman, they are offered contracts and their acceptance is based on their ambition to get to a certain, or to achieve something, to earn bonus for scoring, promotion, etc.
So it's a commercial deal and quite understandably they have both their financial interests in mind, as well as their sporting ambitions.
Like you say, they all woudl have worked hard all season and in the play offs to get to the final, and quite possibly would have gone up. That would have likely triggered a bonus, increase in wages, ability to renegotiate, even to move to another club - at the very least a ton of extra money, exposure, advertising deals, opportunities, etc.
Now they're "stuck" back in the Championship, back to square one and none of if is their fault. Their employer royally fecked up.
I would be amazed if they don't have some kind of legal argument here to claim losses of some kind.
202 pages so far. 192 when they got the verdict.katweslowski wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:46 Either way, it's absolutely fantastic entertainment as an outsider. I think I'll go over to the Southampton forum in a bit just to see if they're still all banging on about how harsh it is.
See my post two above yours. Bans incoming...windermereROYAL wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:49 Seems like it`s not over yet, the FA have launched an investigation, talk about kicking them when they`re down, don`t like them much anyway so fcuk em.
It's brilliant stuff. And likely to run and run and run - the impact on Southampton as a club will me immense. Can confidently see them in League One in a year's time.katweslowski wrote: ↑21 May 2026 09:46 Either way, it's absolutely fantastic entertainment as an outsider. I think I'll go over to the Southampton forum in a bit just to see if they're still all banging on about how harsh it is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests