by South Coast Royal »
12 Apr 2026 10:37
12 Apr 2026 10:37
stealthpapes wrote: ↑12 Apr 2026 10:05
WestYorksRoyal wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 22:44
This "who would replace" question is bothering me a bit. Pardew and McDermott had no managerial experience and did a great job for us. Coppell obviously had some big previous success, but it was >10 years before he managed us which no doubt many would have written off as belonging to a different era. Lincoln was Skubala's first managerial job apart from a few interim games for Leeds.
We're not trying to find a candidate to manage Real Madrid or England.
I was one of the minority who voted "in" earlier for reasons already articulated, but this "who would replace him?" is a non-argument for me.
What our successful managers all had in common is they were right for the team and the club. We had a clear cultural identity in those days and clear roles and responsibilities. We don't currently have that which is a bigger problem than Leam. So let's say the owners have a big reset and try to think about what the identity of the club is, how a manager fits in with that and ultimately conclude Richardson is not the right choice. In that case, get rid of him, as replacement options will be available.
Add McGhee to that list, no previous managerial experience.
Not even giving a manager a Summer to try and enforce his identity on the side is some top tier nonsense. We get rid, next guy doesn’t fly out of the blocks, maybe only a few wins short of play off form. Loses to Swindon in the EFL trophy. Yeah, get rid, I want a new thing.
This cycle, it will not work out well.
You and Ian have staunchly supported the manager based on facts alone, i.e. points gained during his tenure.
Seldom have you or he commented negatively on what we have been watching.
Football is littered with managers given the sack because of the style of play ;in some instances it has appeared to be the wrong thing to do, in others the right thing.
In the end it will depend upon Couhig & Co as to whether results are the only things that matter.
They must surely have noticed the discontent from fans despite the fairly lofty position in the division, yesterday apparently it was more pronounced than ever and a poor performance v Cardiff could make the stadium toxic.
"Be careful what you wish for" has been apt on many occasions, one of the best examples being Curbishley at Charlton who supposedly had taken the club as far as he could in getting them to mid-table in the Premier League and a similar comment applied more recently to David Moyes at West Ham and Man Utd.
None of us know , nor even have a say in ,whether LR keeps his job or is binned to be replaced by somebody who turns out to be better or worse.
What I do know is that there are a number of fans who won't be renewing their season tickets because what we have been watching is oh so dull and Sky/streaming offers a facility where you can switch off and do something else.
Is that important for the owner?
Unlike for any other season I have yet to go to an away game this season but have watched every game on TV so I do know what has happened and there have been so few occasions when I have felt that this team shows any signs of being able to compete at a higher level.
Hiring and firing in theory doesn't work but the same can apply if a club sticks longer than it should with a manager.
Would Rodgers eventually have come good?
Would Clement have come good?
Was Atkins really that bad?
So, we wait and see but, with many more performances as abject as the last 3,the likelihood of LR being kept could well be lower that 50/50.