NathStPaul wrote:
Celtic claiming it's for 'safety concerns'. Likely means there won't be any Rangers fans at Parkhead in December either, due to the 'eye for an eye' nature of the ticket dispute.Green wrote:Celtic refusing tickets at Ibrox.
Will someone bang those two clubs heads together please.
Green wrote:Celtic refusing tickets at Ibrox.
Will someone bang those two clubs heads together please.
It isn't majorly different to Italy, France, German or Holland where, rather than one of 2 winning their league, it is about 1 from 3 usually and we are becoming City or one other.windermereROYAL wrote:Seriously, what is the actual point? Celtic 4-1 up at HT and heading for their 30th win in 32 games.
How is the competition? they will win the league for the 10th time in 11 seasons very soon and their fans will celebrate wildly, can`t think why when they are one of only two teams that can win it.
Aberdeen were the last outside of Glasgow to win the title under one Alex Ferguson way back in 1985.
I wonder why Hearts and Hibs based in the capital don`t have the same resources to challenge the big two.
Football at the top level in each country is so boring and predictable, while it's been like that for decades in many countries, it's sad to see England's top division going the same way now. It seems the best we can get each season now is "which club will lose out to City this time round".South Coast Royal wrote:It isn't majorly different to Italy, France, German or Holland where, rather than one of 2 winning their league, it is about 1 from 3 usually and we are becoming City or one other.windermereROYAL wrote:Seriously, what is the actual point? Celtic 4-1 up at HT and heading for their 30th win in 32 games.
How is the competition? they will win the league for the 10th time in 11 seasons very soon and their fans will celebrate wildly, can`t think why when they are one of only two teams that can win it.
Aberdeen were the last outside of Glasgow to win the title under one Alex Ferguson way back in 1985.
I wonder why Hearts and Hibs based in the capital don`t have the same resources to challenge the big two.
I don't know what Scots feel about it all expect that it has nearly always been like this but I do know that the Old Firm games each season are worth watching for the intensity and excitement.
It was only in the early SPL era (late-90s/early-2000s) when the Scottish league became stupidly unbalanced every season - even if you'd expect one of Rangers or Celtic to win the league each year before that: the season prior to the creation of the SPL, Hearts should've won the league, but collapsed at the end.Sutekh wrote:Football at the top level in each country is so boring and predictable, while it's been like that for decades in many countries, it's sad to see England's top division going the same way now. It seems the best we can get each season now is "which club will lose out to City this time round".South Coast Royal wrote:It isn't majorly different to Italy, France, German or Holland where, rather than one of 2 winning their league, it is about 1 from 3 usually and we are becoming City or one other.windermereROYAL wrote:Seriously, what is the actual point? Celtic 4-1 up at HT and heading for their 30th win in 32 games.
How is the competition? they will win the league for the 10th time in 11 seasons very soon and their fans will celebrate wildly, can`t think why when they are one of only two teams that can win it.
Aberdeen were the last outside of Glasgow to win the title under one Alex Ferguson way back in 1985.
I wonder why Hearts and Hibs based in the capital don`t have the same resources to challenge the big two.
I don't know what Scots feel about it all expect that it has nearly always been like this but I do know that the Old Firm games each season are worth watching for the intensity and excitement.
I saw an interview with David Martindale, the Livingston manager last season where he commented that Celtic like to moan about the elite of Europe having a budgets 40 times the size of theirs but are quite happy with the same financial disparity domestically.Clyde1998 wrote:It was only in the early SPL era (late-90s/early-2000s) when the Scottish league became stupidly unbalanced every season - even if you'd expect one of Rangers or Celtic to win the league each year before that: the season prior to the creation of the SPL, Hearts should've won the league, but collapsed at the end.Sutekh wrote:Football at the top level in each country is so boring and predictable, while it's been like that for decades in many countries, it's sad to see England's top division going the same way now. It seems the best we can get each season now is "which club will lose out to City this time round".South Coast Royal wrote:
It isn't majorly different to Italy, France, German or Holland where, rather than one of 2 winning their league, it is about 1 from 3 usually and we are becoming City or one other.
I don't know what Scots feel about it all expect that it has nearly always been like this but I do know that the Old Firm games each season are worth watching for the intensity and excitement.
The problems really started once clubs started to spend beyond their means on foreign players who weren't worth the money (on both fees and wages), because they believed the newly found wealth via broadcasting revenue would keep increasing. The collapse of the Sky Sports deal early in the SPL era destroyed the smaller SPL clubs financially, whilst Rangers and Celtic benefitted heavily from the rapidly increasing money clubs received from the elite European competitions - especially the Champions League.
Despite all the transfer inflation that's happened since the late-90s, Scottish clubs are spending less now in raw terms than they were at the start of the SPL era. Rangers were spending money like a top Premier League club without the Premier League broadcasting revenue and we all know how that ended.
The Scottish league has become financially unbalanced to a comical level and that's reflected on the pitch - the bigger leagues have reached a similar point in the past decade. Even the gap between the top 10-12 clubs (globally) and the rest has exploded to a point the rest cannot reasonably compete.
Wonder if they had problems fielding a team at the start of the season, as their form seems to have dramatically improved in recent weeks - their only win so far coming against the team in 6th (Civil Service Strollers ftw!).Winston Biscuit wrote:Gretna, now in the Scottish Lowland League, have already conceded 53 goals and only scored 5, in their opening 11 games, but are not bottom of the league
According to Jacob Rees Mogg Strollers is about four gears up for normal civil servants, so that may explain the resultSanguine wrote:Wonder if they had problems fielding a team at the start of the season, as their form seems to have dramatically improved in recent weeks - their only win so far coming against the team in 6th (Civil Service Strollers ftw!).Winston Biscuit wrote:Gretna, now in the Scottish Lowland League, have already conceded 53 goals and only scored 5, in their opening 11 games, but are not bottom of the league
That would be the League Cup semi.Winston Biscuit wrote:Hearts are into the Scottish Cup semi final and its only September. Lolwut?!
It's very confusing in Scotland as there's 3 cups I think for the senior Scottish sides and they all seem to be generally referred to as the Scottish Cup:Clyde1998 wrote:That would be the League Cup semi.Winston Biscuit wrote:Hearts are into the Scottish Cup semi final and its only September. Lolwut?!
The format was changed a few years back where all teams not in Europe would play in a group stage in pre-season, with sides in Europe entering in the first knockout round and the final being held prior to the end of the calendar year. Effectively for top division sides: League Cup in the first half of the season; Scottish Cup in the second half.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 11 guests