Logical link, his family still lives in the Wokingham area I believe - would therefore be the obvious “go to” should Noel be decommissioned. However, how much money would it take to persuade Gillingham to curtail their Ainsworthing activities?Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Being lined up according to football league world.
Certainly noise is increasing nationally....Andy Preston locally published something where pundits were questioning our coaching and tactics...
Probably has some kind of release clause if a L1 club comes in for him.Sutekh wrote:Logical link, his family still lives in the Wokingham area I believe - would therefore be the obvious “go to” should Noel be decommissioned. However, how much money would it take to persuade Gillingham to curtail their Ainsworthing activities?Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Being lined up according to football league world.
Certainly noise is increasing nationally....Andy Preston locally published something where pundits were questioning our coaching and tactics...
Diamond Duo or the Gold Digger.Millsy wrote:I heard we have lined up the following:
Glenn Hoddle (alongside Chris Waddle)
and if that fails we're going for Mark McGhee
You read it here first.
So it is ok not to believe it when the owner says that we would have an amazing transfer window but to believe him when he says that Ainsworth isn't on his list?Snowflake Royal wrote:It seems unlikely seeing as Couhig has said he has targets should he need them and Ainsworth isn't one of them.
Just lazy 'journalism'.
If one is capable of engaging one's brain to tell the difference between a factual statement and a hyperbolic aim, yeah, absolutely.South Coast Royal wrote:So it is ok not to believe it when the owner says that we would have an amazing transfer window but to believe him when he says that Ainsworth isn't on his list?Snowflake Royal wrote:It seems unlikely seeing as Couhig has said he has targets should he need them and Ainsworth isn't one of them.
Just lazy 'journalism'.
The Ainsworth related statement can be taken as a factual statement and therefore readily believable rather than the transfer window statement which can only be ever taken as subjective and therefore only believable to a few with a particularly imaginative point of view (so, a bit like a government statement).Snowflake Royal wrote:If one is capable of engaging one's brain to tell the difference between a factual statement and a hyperbolic aim, yeah, absolutely.South Coast Royal wrote:So it is ok not to believe it when the owner says that we would have an amazing transfer window but to believe him when he says that Ainsworth isn't on his list?Snowflake Royal wrote:It seems unlikely seeing as Couhig has said he has targets should he need them and Ainsworth isn't one of them.
Just lazy 'journalism'.
Would rather have Debbie.Millsy wrote: and if that fails we're going for Mark McGhee
If we take the transfer window as a model, it seems we had to readjust expectations and shop in a less exclusive pool.rabidbee wrote:I assume that if it ever comes to having to negotiate compensation with a club whose manager you’ve just poached, it probably doesn’t help your case if you’ve gone on record several months earlier with your plan to do it. And whatever names Couhig had in mind in the summer doesn’t mean any of them would certainly be interested or available next time there’s a vacancy, so really that’s no more than dampening down the Ainsworth speculation at the start of the season.
Are you happy about this?oggy wrote:WATCH THIS SPACE MR SELLES IS COMING BACK, NEXT WEEK WHEN WE ARE BOTTOM AND NO WHERE ELSE TO GO

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], RoyalsMRR and 2 guests