These are the only two serious, sensible answers so I can only conclude that the OP is neither serious nor sensible.Banned answers
- Generic comment about entitled football fans. Of course I want to watch my team be successful and be enjoyable to watch, otherwise what is the fcuking point? I've been patient this season under the new owners; now it's time to start seeing us deliver.
- We can't assess before we see how the transfer window goes. Wrong, we can assess now based upon what we've seen this season and the progress we've observed. If in August we look a long way off that, that is a collectively failure of Couhig, JJ, Carey and Richardson.
Fine, but when do you start agitating to get rid? We got rid of Hunt after only one proper transfer window. If we're lower-midtable before Xmas, is that really enough to start saying "man's got to carry the can". Are there any examples from previous RFC seasons where this would not have been the best way forward?If we don't finish in the top 6, that is a failure for which Leam will probably carry the can (even if it can be tied back to recruitment decisions of those above his head). And then there is the matter of performances. If we finish 6th and lose in the semis or finish 7th/8th, the question of whether we actually enjoy watching the team matters a lot too. If Leam wants us to be a workman-like team, he had better win promotion. I've been patient with him due to what he inherited, but he won't be able to make the same excuses with a full summer behind him.
3 8 2 5 9 68
It's undeniably worked. I think we are better off with Richardson longer term, and have performed better under him.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 16:25 To Ian and Papes - do you think it was the right decision to sack Hunt now or still the wrong one? Would you have trusted Hunt to keep us up, or get anything like the points hail that LR has - and then build for next season or was it the right call to bring in LR?
My opinion is the change of manager was the single best decision made this season
Yeah that side could well have dropped. Adding Lane and Ritchie wouldn’t have stopped thatSnowflake Royal wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 17:04It's undeniably worked. I think we are better off with Richardson longer term, and have performed better under him.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 16:25 To Ian and Papes - do you think it was the right decision to sack Hunt now or still the wrong one? Would you have trusted Hunt to keep us up, or get anything like the points hail that LR has - and then build for next season or was it the right call to bring in LR?
My opinion is the change of manager was the single best decision made this season
I think we pulled the trigger a few weeks sooner than I would have liked. I still think Hunt would have kept us up if we hadn't sacked him. And there was plenty of time to wait and still save us from relegation, which seems well supported by Leam getting us on the verge of the POs.
Edit: I will say though, there's an argument in hindsight that Couhig should have pulled the trigger sooner and maybe Richardson would have us in the POs with a few more games of the season to improve results.
But I think the biggest issue with our season was having practically a whole new squad, some key signings failing and some key injuries.
If we have a fit Marriott, O'Connor and Williams from the start, it's a different story.
Just as a reminder our first game against Lincoln to start the season was:
Pereira
Abrefa - relegated to the youth side
Burns - relegated to squad back up
Stickland - sent out on loan several tiers down
Dorsett - failing to progress
Savage
Wing
Elliott - fallen apart again and failed to stake a claim
Kelvin - out wide
MOM - utter failure of a loan
Camara - shipped out on loan not good enough.
That's a dreadful side. You'd only expect 3 of them to be first XI starters next season.
I think Papes point is that people were calling for Hunt to go after 1 or 2 games, and Leam before any. Brogue certainly, but he starts the bandwagon and people quickly jump on the toxic train long before it should be a question in anyone's mind.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 17:20Yeah that side could well have dropped. Adding Lane and Ritchie wouldn’t have stopped thatSnowflake Royal wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 17:04It's undeniably worked. I think we are better off with Richardson longer term, and have performed better under him.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 16:25 To Ian and Papes - do you think it was the right decision to sack Hunt now or still the wrong one? Would you have trusted Hunt to keep us up, or get anything like the points hail that LR has - and then build for next season or was it the right call to bring in LR?
My opinion is the change of manager was the single best decision made this season
I think we pulled the trigger a few weeks sooner than I would have liked. I still think Hunt would have kept us up if we hadn't sacked him. And there was plenty of time to wait and still save us from relegation, which seems well supported by Leam getting us on the verge of the POs.
Edit: I will say though, there's an argument in hindsight that Couhig should have pulled the trigger sooner and maybe Richardson would have us in the POs with a few more games of the season to improve results.
But I think the biggest issue with our season was having practically a whole new squad, some key signings failing and some key injuries.
If we have a fit Marriott, O'Connor and Williams from the start, it's a different story.
Just as a reminder our first game against Lincoln to start the season was:
Pereira
Abrefa - relegated to the youth side
Burns - relegated to squad back up
Stickland - sent out on loan several tiers down
Dorsett - failing to progress
Savage
Wing
Elliott - fallen apart again and failed to stake a claim
Kelvin - out wide
MOM - utter failure of a loan
Camara - shipped out on loan not good enough.
That's a dreadful side. You'd only expect 3 of them to be first XI starters next season.
Williams and Marriott have been undoubted successes when fit, sadly it was always odds against they’d remain that way
The idea of getting rid of LR now I certainly massively disagree with - but I’m not quite sure the point papes is trying to make other than defending LR’s record which is reasonable. Sometimes sacking a manager is the correct call. What I think we have now though is an owner, CEO and manager aligned which wasn’t there under Hunt
I think we'll end up in about the same place. A win or two in it.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 16:25 To Ian and Papes - do you think it was the right decision to sack Hunt now or still the wrong one? Would you have trusted Hunt to keep us up, or get anything like the points hail that LR has - and then build for next season or was it the right call to bring in LR?
My opinion is the change of manager was the single best decision made this season
Pretty much. Even this thread is basically a LEAM OUT thread in a pretty bonnet.I think Papes point is that people were calling for Hunt to go after 1 or 2 games, and Leam before any. Brogue certainly, but he starts the bandwagon and people quickly jump on the toxic train long before it should be a question in anyone's mind.