yeah only the magic train stops there which leaves from platform 1EThe 17 Bus wrote:so it is to be a private railway station, does this bode well for football traffic, somehow I doubt it.
That really doesn't sound like a good idea.Royalshow wrote:Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
Anybody else see the irony in a large insurance company wanting to build homes on a flood plain, when it's the insurance industry that's been amongst the most strident in opposition to such plans?Royalshow wrote:Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
by Reading Til I Die » 05 Feb 2008 14:31
05 Feb 2008 14:31by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 05 Feb 2008 14:50
05 Feb 2008 14:50by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Feb 2008 20:01
05 Feb 2008 20:01how does a private railway station differ from the rest of the privately owned rail network?The 17 Bus wrote:so it is to be a private railway station, does this bode well for football traffic, somehow I doubt it.
No they don't - that's Legal and General.The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 06 Feb 2008 09:54
06 Feb 2008 09:54Ah - oops. Memory failing me again. I felt sure it was the Pru.Platypuss wrote:No they don't - that's Legal and General.The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
http://www.crowthorneconsultation.co.uk/The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:Ah - oops. Memory failing me again. I felt sure it was the Pru.Platypuss wrote:No they don't - that's Legal and General.The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
well, when I cycled from town last Saturday there was quite a big lake by the side of Rose Kiln lane; it looked quite attractiveThe 17 Bus wrote:Except that it will no longer be a flood plain as they have managed to make a lake south of the M4 for the water to go.
Lower Earley used to be a flood plain, but thats ok, it is all down to how water is managed.
by Upper West Ginger » 07 Feb 2008 12:47
07 Feb 2008 12:47Nope. Prudential don't do general insurance at all any more. They sold their general insurance business (i.e. home insurance and car insurance) to Churchill a few years ago.Skyline wrote:Anybody else see the irony in a large insurance company wanting to build homes on a flood plain, when it's the insurance industry that's been amongst the most strident in opposition to such plans?Royalshow wrote:Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
OK, I know the Pru's insurance operations are primarily in life assurance rather than home insurance, but it still looks distinctly odd.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good argument. Pensions servicing is still taking place in the UK. Prudential aren't closing any offices in Scotland, they're only got one, near Stirling, which they're planning to expand. Your comment on the Reading offices is also incorrect. They're outsourcing 750 Reading-based jobs to Capita, but that will still leave 750 Reading-based staff employed by Prudential.Reading Til I Die wrote:The way things are going at the Prudential I expect them to get very heavily involved in the New Homes/Affordable Homes market.
They're shipping all there work to existing pensions servicing work India, the call centres are in India and they're closing offices they have in Scotland. On top of that the Reading offices will only hold about 100-200 UK-based employees throughout the whole business in a few months
At the same time they're buying huge amounts of land in and around the Reading area.
Prudential Estate Agents?
Cheers
RTID
Users browsing this forum: Number 9 and 90 guests