MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

176 posts

Result predictor

Reading win
2
12%
Draw
4
24%
Lincoln win
11
65%
 
Total votes: 17
User avatar
John Madejski's Wallet
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 29315
Joined: 10 Apr 2005 00:22
Location: Anyone who lives within their means shows a serious lack of imagination

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by John Madejski's Wallet » 06 Apr 2026 20:41

On the late changes, what on earth it the point of playing Kayewaa as a right wing back, but then constantly having the ball hoofed over him by Burns? He may as well not been there

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4811
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: The depths of despair

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Orion1871 » 06 Apr 2026 20:53

Shockingly bad. Coppell apparently said "you wouldn't want to watch that every week" after the game. Nothing any of us can say is more damning than that from our greatest ever manager.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 06 Apr 2026 21:37

traff wrote: 06 Apr 2026 17:27
Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 16:50 Lane is such an odd duck. He seems to be trying to do all the right things, has a good record in the division, and yet his passing accuracy is dreadful, he's got no pace so never gets away from anyone, and is frequently just brushed off the ball.
Criticising Lane! tut tut tut
You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 06 Apr 2026 21:45

Hound wrote: 06 Apr 2026 17:58 Oh and ref was shite. Didn’t look a fk for the goal, and maybe those watching on tbe steam can tell me otherwise but their forward should have had a (second) yellow for that challenge on JP at 1-1?
FK - Savage goes to hook a ball over his shoulder to clear, and player comes from his blindside to try to head. Savage gets the ball, then maybe a piece of face. It's a very generous FK imo. But if we actually defend it, rather than leave a man free and then palm his shot in the net (hard one to save admittedly), shouldn't be an issue.

DK penalty shout. He's body checked after the ball went. It's usually given as a pen imo.

A generous interpretation for Lloyd is he stumbles and falls into Pereira. It is at least a talking to, should really be a yellow, I can see a ref not giving the second yellow early, but that late when it should have little impact? Usually should be a yellow imo

MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 548
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by MR. CYNICAL » 06 Apr 2026 22:00

Orion1871 wrote: 06 Apr 2026 20:53 Shockingly bad. Coppell apparently said "you wouldn't want to watch that every week" after the game. Nothing any of us can say is more damning than that from our greatest ever manager.
That's Richardsonball for you.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 06 Apr 2026 22:02

I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.

Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.

No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.

We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.

Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.

There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.

We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.

Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3816
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Royalwaster » 06 Apr 2026 22:22

Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.

Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.

No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.

We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.

Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.

There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.

We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.

Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
+1 ... nice to read a sensible reaction

Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10495
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Lefty echochamber scared of free speech

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Millsy » 06 Apr 2026 22:33

Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.

Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.

No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.

We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.

Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.

There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.

We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.

Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
Good post.

I'm just not convinced that hodling out for a draw would've been the best option. Sure in hindsight we can all say that, but when you have the momentum, you go for it. Especially when risking to gain 2 points or lose 1. And Against a team with their heads down and remeber only needed a draw, so would presumably not be as keen to attack.

Easy to knock it in hindsight but I think it was a reasonable shout.

It's not as though we're any good at holding onto points anyway is it. Attack as a form of defence is what most of us have been crying out for as a result.

Just opinions though, no right or wrong I get that.

traff
Member
Posts: 824
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 00:08

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by traff » 07 Apr 2026 00:02

Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 21:37
traff wrote: 06 Apr 2026 17:27
Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 16:50 Lane is such an odd duck. He seems to be trying to do all the right things, has a good record in the division, and yet his passing accuracy is dreadful, he's got no pace so never gets away from anyone, and is frequently just brushed off the ball.
Criticising Lane! tut tut tut
You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.
“Funny how criticising Lane is suddenly a problem when I do it, but perfectly fine when the self appointed know all (who doesnt attend matches Snowflake does the exact same thing.”

“And don’t worry about my quoting, worry about making a consistent point.”

traff
Member
Posts: 824
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 00:08

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by traff » 07 Apr 2026 00:06

Orion1871 wrote: 06 Apr 2026 20:53 Shockingly bad. Coppell apparently said "you wouldn't want to watch that every week" after the game. Nothing any of us can say is more damning than that from our greatest ever manager.
Ah, but has Coppell ever played at Bradford?

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8069
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Apr 2026 06:02

One silver lining - we won't be playing Lincoln next season. Is that 4 losses in a row against them?

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9357
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by windermereROYAL » 07 Apr 2026 06:56

Just a thought, if results go their way Cardiff could come here in 11 days needing to win to go up, they have Notlob next week.

Charity fc will do their best to help them I`m sure, they had 29 shots away at Peterborough yesterday.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 07 Apr 2026 07:35

traff wrote: 07 Apr 2026 00:02
Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 21:37
traff wrote: 06 Apr 2026 17:27

Criticising Lane! tut tut tut
You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.
“Funny how criticising Lane is suddenly a problem when I do it, but perfectly fine when the self appointed know all (who doesnt attend matches Snowflake does the exact same thing.”

“And don’t worry about my quoting, worry about making a consistent point.”
For the hard of thinking, constantly abusing Lane regardless of performance is not the same as critiquing an individual performance.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27395
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Hound » 07 Apr 2026 08:18

Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.

Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.

No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.

We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.

Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.

There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.

We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.

Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
I don’t disagree with much of that. A point wouldn’t have done us a lot of good and imagine what a boost it’d have been if we’d gone on and won the game. No issue with us conceding again whilst going for it.

I’d stick by my comment we’re not brave enough though. I get Lincoln are setting the traps to counter but we still needed to move the ball forward more and quicker

It’s all for next season now. I think LR has a clear idea and vision of what he wants and it isn’t this team. Let’s see

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9357
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by windermereROYAL » 07 Apr 2026 08:18

Sutekh wrote: 06 Apr 2026 15:43
windermereROYAL wrote: 06 Apr 2026 15:34 New server having an Easter holiday.
The Biscuit Tin might be an option to run this thread.
You got the link?, I`m sick of this shit show.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25220
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Sutekh » 07 Apr 2026 08:29

windermereROYAL wrote: 07 Apr 2026 08:18
Sutekh wrote: 06 Apr 2026 15:43
windermereROYAL wrote: 06 Apr 2026 15:34 New server having an Easter holiday.
The Biscuit Tin might be an option to run this thread.
You got the link?, I`m sick of this shit show.
https://aeback-up.freeforums.net/

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 07 Apr 2026 08:40

Hound wrote: 07 Apr 2026 08:18
Snowflake Royal wrote: 06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.

Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.

No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.

We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.

Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.

There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.

We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.

Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
I don’t disagree with much of that. A point wouldn’t have done us a lot of good and imagine what a boost it’d have been if we’d gone on and won the game. No issue with us conceding again whilst going for it.

I’d stick by my comment we’re not brave enough though. I get Lincoln are setting the traps to counter but we still needed to move the ball forward more and quicker

It’s all for next season now. I think LR has a clear idea and vision of what he wants and it isn’t this team. Let’s see
Bravery comes with success and confidence imo.... football becomes more instinctive the better you do. I think if we can improve the defence, everything else improves, because fewer errors get punished, results are better and everyone can relax more.

A N Other, Williams, Ward, maybe Roberts

Is a lot better than Nyambe, Burns, O'Oconnor, Dorsett

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27395
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Hound » 07 Apr 2026 08:43

Yes, I think a lot of our issues stem from the lack of pace at the back

Nyambe was decent yesterday though. Would be happy enough if he signed

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4811
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: The depths of despair

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Orion1871 » 07 Apr 2026 08:45

Hound wrote: 07 Apr 2026 08:43 Yes, I think a lot of our issues stem from the lack of pace at the back

Nyambe was decent yesterday though. Would be happy enough if he signed
Just at the back?

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27395
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Lincoln City (h)

by Hound » 07 Apr 2026 08:55

Orion1871 wrote: 07 Apr 2026 08:45
Hound wrote: 07 Apr 2026 08:43 Yes, I think a lot of our issues stem from the lack of pace at the back

Nyambe was decent yesterday though. Would be happy enough if he signed
Just at the back?
Well no; all over the pitch. Though we do have some quicker forwards

176 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 30 guests

It is currently 03 May 2026 22:29