You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.traff wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 17:27Criticising Lane! tut tut tutSnowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 16:50 Lane is such an odd duck. He seems to be trying to do all the right things, has a good record in the division, and yet his passing accuracy is dreadful, he's got no pace so never gets away from anyone, and is frequently just brushed off the ball.
FK - Savage goes to hook a ball over his shoulder to clear, and player comes from his blindside to try to head. Savage gets the ball, then maybe a piece of face. It's a very generous FK imo. But if we actually defend it, rather than leave a man free and then palm his shot in the net (hard one to save admittedly), shouldn't be an issue.
+1 ... nice to read a sensible reactionSnowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.
Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.
No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.
We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.
Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.
There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.
We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.
Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
Good post.Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.
Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.
No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.
We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.
Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.
There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.
We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.
Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
“Funny how criticising Lane is suddenly a problem when I do it, but perfectly fine when the self appointed know all (who doesnt attend matches Snowflake does the exact same thing.”Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 21:37You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.traff wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 17:27Criticising Lane! tut tut tutSnowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 16:50 Lane is such an odd duck. He seems to be trying to do all the right things, has a good record in the division, and yet his passing accuracy is dreadful, he's got no pace so never gets away from anyone, and is frequently just brushed off the ball.
For the hard of thinking, constantly abusing Lane regardless of performance is not the same as critiquing an individual performance.traff wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 00:02“Funny how criticising Lane is suddenly a problem when I do it, but perfectly fine when the self appointed know all (who doesnt attend matches Snowflake does the exact same thing.”Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 21:37You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.
“And don’t worry about my quoting, worry about making a consistent point.”
I don’t disagree with much of that. A point wouldn’t have done us a lot of good and imagine what a boost it’d have been if we’d gone on and won the game. No issue with us conceding again whilst going for it.Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.
Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.
No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.
We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.
Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.
There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.
We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.
Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
https://aeback-up.freeforums.net/windermereROYAL wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 08:18You got the link?, I`m sick of this shit show.
Bravery comes with success and confidence imo.... football becomes more instinctive the better you do. I think if we can improve the defence, everything else improves, because fewer errors get punished, results are better and everyone can relax more.Hound wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 08:18I don’t disagree with much of that. A point wouldn’t have done us a lot of good and imagine what a boost it’d have been if we’d gone on and won the game. No issue with us conceding again whilst going for it.Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.
Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.
No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.
We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.
Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.
There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.
We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.
Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
I’d stick by my comment we’re not brave enough though. I get Lincoln are setting the traps to counter but we still needed to move the ball forward more and quicker
It’s all for next season now. I think LR has a clear idea and vision of what he wants and it isn’t this team. Let’s see
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Google [Bot], Lower West, Royalcop and 28 guests