Purely because they brought in a specific rule after the Leeds incident I expect it to be a lot heavier punishment than that one was.
The whole thing really annoys me. It's not just rule breaking, it's just so unethical, so unsportsmanlike, lacking in any class or dignity and is just blatant cheating. It's not about the benefits gained by Southampton, it's the act itself.6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑13 May 2026 13:19Purely because they brought in a specific rule after the Leeds incident I expect it to be a lot heavier punishment than that one was.
Football fans are just twats aren't they.genome wrote: ↑14 May 2026 09:34 Pitch invader slide tackles the Stevenage keeper from behind
https://x.com/The_Forty_Four/status/2054806379861250057
Hoping Bolton get through the POs as that at least means we would avoid a 3rd successive 5-2 stuffing at their place.6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑14 May 2026 09:36Football fans are just twats aren't they.genome wrote: ↑14 May 2026 09:34 Pitch invader slide tackles the Stevenage keeper from behind
https://x.com/The_Forty_Four/status/2054806379861250057
That is oxf*rd hilarious6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑14 May 2026 09:36Football fans are just twats aren't they.genome wrote: ↑14 May 2026 09:34 Pitch invader slide tackles the Stevenage keeper from behind
https://x.com/The_Forty_Four/status/2054806379861250057
Yep, but they're delaying things as long as they can, asking for extra time, precisely to make the possibility of that happening much less likely.katweslowski wrote: ↑13 May 2026 13:35The whole thing really annoys me. It's not just rule breaking, it's just so unethical, so unsportsmanlike, lacking in any class or dignity and is just blatant cheating. It's not about the benefits gained by Southampton, it's the act itself.6ft Kerplunk wrote: ↑13 May 2026 13:19Purely because they brought in a specific rule after the Leeds incident I expect it to be a lot heavier punishment than that one was.
I personally think if proven, an example should be set and they should not be allowed to continue in the playoffs. It's the EFL competition, their rules, their matches, their processes. If it's shown that Southampton sanctioned this, they were aware and planned this, then block them and give the spot to Middlesbrough
Apparently the 'Boro players have reported back to training just in case and the implication is that other members of the Saints staff were complicit and it wasn't the first time.Sutekh wrote: ↑14 May 2026 14:22 FL are currently waiting for Southampton to respond to their letter to them over the events. One would expect that letter to demand a response by a certain date or else….![]()
Whatever, if reports are to be believed then Southampton are clearly in breach of FL rules over this sort of thing which state “ no club shall directly or indirectly observe (or attempt to observe) another club's training session in the period of 72 hours prior to any match “.
Leeds were fined £200,000 for their breach. Presuming Southampton fail to satisfy the FL over the events then I’d presume they’d be looking at a fine and probably considerably more if they beat Hull. Personally, if found guilty, I’d declare their win over ‘boro void and award the “tie” to the Teesiders. In any case this needs to be resolved by the end of this week.
Agree with both - I would like to see them disqualified personally but believe it'll be a large fine which is pretty pointless - particularly if they won and get £100m or whatever the financial benefits are these days.South Coast Royal wrote: ↑14 May 2026 15:29Apparently the 'Boro players have reported back to training just in case and the implication is that other members of the Saints staff were complicit and it wasn't the first time.Sutekh wrote: ↑14 May 2026 14:22 FL are currently waiting for Southampton to respond to their letter to them over the events. One would expect that letter to demand a response by a certain date or else….![]()
Whatever, if reports are to be believed then Southampton are clearly in breach of FL rules over this sort of thing which state “ no club shall directly or indirectly observe (or attempt to observe) another club's training session in the period of 72 hours prior to any match “.
Leeds were fined £200,000 for their breach. Presuming Southampton fail to satisfy the FL over the events then I’d presume they’d be looking at a fine and probably considerably more if they beat Hull. Personally, if found guilty, I’d declare their win over ‘boro void and award the “tie” to the Teesiders. In any case this needs to be resolved by the end of this week.
Saints also withdrew from selling tickets for the final.
It is probably too near to the set-in-stone date for the final so ,rather than a re-match, I expect Saints to be hit with a big fine.
But if they're not, Middlesbrough will do the same, or just as likely sue Southampton for all the PL revenue they've "stolen". Their Chairman has form.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑14 May 2026 22:20 Can't see them being booted. If the EFL tried, Saints would immediately sue in court and that could seriously fukk the end of the season
The EFL can today provide an interim update on the ongoing disciplinary proceedings involving Southampton following Tuesday’s Championship Play-Off Semi-Final Second Leg.
The Independent Disciplinary Commission hearing will take place on or before Tuesday, 19 May.
The exact date remains under discussion and is expected to be confirmed shortly.
The Commission will issue its decision as soon as possible following consideration of the relevant submissions and evidence.
As the proceedings are being conducted by an Independent Disciplinary Commission, the EFL does not control the proposed timetable.
Notwithstanding this, the EFL continues to plan on the basis that the Championship Play-Off Final will take place as scheduled on Saturday 23 May, with the kick-off time confirmed as 4.30pm.
Supporters should, however, be aware that the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings may yet result in changes to the fixture.
The EFL has a number of contingency plans should they be required, which also includes consideration of any appeal process, if required.
FWIW - EFL rules do not permit cases to be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.John Madejski's Wallet wrote: ↑14 May 2026 22:20 Can't see them being booted. If the EFL tried, Saints would immediately sue in court and that could seriously fukk the end of the season
I'm not sure. There are plenty of precedents for clubs suing each other. Sheffield United and West Ham over Tevez, Middlesbrough and Derby over FFP breaches.Winston Biscuit wrote: ↑15 May 2026 12:27 football finance/rules matey on talksport yesterday poo poo'd the idea of Southampton paying off Middlesbrough to get this out the way, as he made the point that this is not an arbitration issue between Middlesbrough and Southampton, its a disciplinary issue between Southampton and the EFL
Sporting penalties are the only punishments that mean anything, given the size of any fines dished out are pointless because they’re barely the cost a club would pay for a 3rd or 4th division reserve player.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests