Reading FC Match Report: 2023/2024 Season - League One
READING 2 PORTSMOUTH 3
Reading: L Wing (23), C Savage (27)
Portsmouth: F Anjorin (33), C Bishop (45), T Devlin (58)
Reading stunned the huge contingent of travelling Pompey fans into silence racing into a two goal lead midway through the first half with excellent strikes from Wing and Savage. A two goal lead usually provides a platform to control the game, but at no stage did Reading look in control.
Startled by their unexpected success the Royals sat back and defended poorly. Portsmouth, unbeaten this season, were always going to take advantage of that situation. Gaping holes at the back and an absence of pressure on the ball resulted in an inevitable Pompey goal. Anjorin reduced the lead after thirty three minutes drifting unchallenged into the box to beat Button from ten yards.
Smith and Azeez posed a threat with their pace and aggression on the break and Smith could easily have restored Reading's two goal advantage but missed the target after going past the Pompey keeper
If Reading could have reached half time with a one goal lead they might have been able take a point from this tough fixture. Unfortunately Pompey equalised through Bishop in the ninth minute of stoppage time after a minimum of eight minutes of stoppage time added to enable stewards to clear a cascade of tennis balls hurled onto the pitch in yet another futile protest against an owner who clearly not at all concerned about popularity.
There was a lack of intensity and energy about Reading's play with the notable exception of Smith who won just about every ball in the air and tormented the vistors defence with a second excellent performance of the week.
Thirteen minutes into the second half Portsmouth added a third and winning goal which was largely attributed to poor defending. Pompey were given ample time and space to deliver crosses into the Reading box all afternoon, and that sloppiness lead to the winner. A long and high ball to the far post from could have been caught by Button or headed clear by Guinness- Walker but instead Bishop was left unchallenged to nod the ball down for Devlin, also unmarked, to volley past Button.
The arrival of Mbengue, Elliot and Mukairu galvanised Reading into action and Reading began to look like getting back into the game. It has to be said the body language and commitment of Knibbs and Azeez looked questionable before they were given the hook.
Ehibhatiomhan had a chance but a heavy touch hampered his finish. It took a brilliant save from Norris to out a great strike from Elliott, and Button of all people in a desperate foray forward late in the game also had a chance to equalise.
It was a case of too little too late but basically as a team Reading came up short when under pressure. Yiadom returning from suspension was at his best but I am not sure the omission of Abbey was wise.
To round off another disappointing performance Mbengue was given a red card after the final whistle after a clash that had been brewing almost as soon as Mbengue arrived on the pitch and started to show some much needed aggression. Pity he will now be unavailable for the next match. Reading need a bit more of what he offers!
Doubts about team selection and tactics are beginning to cast a shadow over Selles and he needs a win very soon or he may find himself being replaced.
Problems off the field and on the field are currently not looking likely to resolved quickly or easily. Worrying times indeed for Reading fans.
John Wells
Post Match Fans' Opinion
Lower West
» 28 Oct 2023 18:33
Confidence rock bottom. Small things in games going against us (ie savages shot vs Fleetwood), losing mentality. Bad luck.
I’ve not seen anything to suggest with the players we have we should be anywhere near relegation tbh. When we’re on our game we look a decent side
A decent manager would turn this around quickly, I’m pretty sure of it
The hallmark of a young inexperienced side. Look good for large parts of games but don't have the experience or the guile to turn it into points.
The recent series on BBC - Boot Camp. Was a fascinating insight into why technically good young footballers fail to make the grade ultimately in the professional game. Despite coming through the ranks of the top academies.
Elm Park Kid
» 28 Oct 2023 18:48
The hallmark of a young inexperienced side. Look good for large parts of games but don't have the experience or the guile to turn it into points.
The recent series on BBC - Boot Camp. Was a fascinating insight into why technically good young footballers fail to make the grade ultimately in the professional game. Despite coming through the ranks of the top academies.
What were the main reasons? I remember reading a book written by a scout who said that mentality and family stability were almost important as skill. It didn't matter how good some kids were, basically if they're a dick then they're not going to make it.
leon
» 28 Oct 2023 18:50
He’s clearly not learning anything. He’s got to go.
Winston Biscuit
» 28 Oct 2023 18:51
Ooh whereabouts? Upper west?
Yeah was a last minute decision and was going on my own so thought I'd try it.
Upper West. Back row of block GU5 if that means anything to you.
I didn't even know where to find gate 2 to get into the stand, kept wandering about looking for it :lol: :lol:
blythspartan
» 28 Oct 2023 19:38
We can’t defend out wide and we make it far too easy for other teams to get crosses into our box. One of my issues with Selles is that he doesn’t seem to be able to effect the game with his substitutions. It all seems a bit more in hope rather than having a clear plan.
He won’t be fired, so I can see us staying rooted to the bottom of the table for the rest of the season. Hopefully, sooner rather than later we’ll hit rock bottom as a club and then the rebuild can begin.
Clyde1998
» 28 Oct 2023 19:54
The table calculator (projector?) I use reckons we've got a 59% chance of relegation now, based on our current xG (both for and against) this season, and we'd be likely to get relegated even without our points deduction. Our xG is comparable to sides like Bristol Rovers, Wycombe and Exeter - the difference is those sides are actually putting points on the board while we're not. Portsmouth have a 61% chance of the title and a 82% chance of automatic promotion.
YorkshireRoyal99
» 28 Oct 2023 19:55
We haven't been able to defend in wide areas for 3 years now, it's been probably the weakest defensive area of our game for years.
Funnily enough, I remember an post-match Paul Ince interview (kudos if you remember which game) where he mentioned it was in our "culture" to sit back and protect a lead, and he couldn't understand why (despite being the manager, first problem). It's like it's in our culture to be poor at defending in wide areas and from crosses. (It could just be in our culture that we are poor at defending in general).
CountryRoyal
» 28 Oct 2023 20:07
While we haven’t seen everyone yet, Portsmouth look a cut above everything else we’ve seen. Based on that anyone that finishes above them, is promoted.
If we’d played like that all season we’re a lot higher in the league imho.
Clyde1998
» 28 Oct 2023 20:11
We haven't been able to defend in wide areas for 3 years now, it's been probably the weakest defensive area of our game for years.
Funnily enough, I remember an post-match Paul Ince interview (kudos if you remember which game) where he mentioned it was in our "culture" to sit back and protect a lead, and he couldn't understand why (despite being the manager, first problem). It's like it's in our culture to be poor at defending in wide areas and from crosses. (It could just be in our culture that we are poor at defending in general).
I think the problem in the wide defensive areas is we're expecting our full-backs to be involved in attacks, whilst also being good defensively. There aren't many players that can do both well (at our level) - that is be good going forward, whilst also being good defensively; players tend to be good at one aspect or mediocre at both.
I think the only real solutions for us at the moment would be: not allowing the full-backs to advance as far up the pitch during attacks as they do currently; playing with a holding midfielder who remains deep during attacks (or could drop into a CB position); or playing with three CBs. The latter two should ensure there's enough defensive cover when the FBs push forward.
YorkshireRoyal99
» 28 Oct 2023 20:19
We haven't been able to defend in wide areas for 3 years now, it's been probably the weakest defensive area of our game for years.
Funnily enough, I remember an post-match Paul Ince interview (kudos if you remember which game) where he mentioned it was in our "culture" to sit back and protect a lead, and he couldn't understand why (despite being the manager, first problem). It's like it's in our culture to be poor at defending in wide areas and from crosses. (It could just be in our culture that we are poor at defending in general).
I think the problem in the wide defensive areas is we're expecting our full-backs to be involved in attacks, whilst also being good defensively. There aren't many players that can do both well (at our level) - that is be good going forward, whilst also being good defensively; players tend to be good at one aspect or mediocre at both.
I think the only real solutions for us at the moment would be: not allowing the full-backs to advance as far up the pitch during attacks as they do currently; playing with a holding midfielder who remains deep during attacks (or could drop into a CB position); or playing with three CBs. The latter two should ensure there's enough defensive cover when the FBs push forward.
But it was a thing last season as well, we were extremely poor at defending from wide areas and we played without advancing wing backs and with 3 CB's. Granted, that's probably because we invited a lot more pressure rather than leaving ourselves wide open like we do now so understand that it is different in itself, but we just seem really, really poor at defending wide areas.
I could understand being worse last season against better quality opposition, but I think it's also just a combination of our full backs just not being very good in general, manager tactics as well as mentality. When was the last time we genuinely had decent full backs? Richards and Yiadom/Esteves? Even they were flawed but a marked improvement on everything we've had since (Yiadom post the 7th-placed season under Pauno).
Snowflake Royal
» 28 Oct 2023 20:43
This. Sounds crazy to say this when bottom of the table and 8 points from safety, but if a new owner can arrive in the next few weeks I can still see us getting to the relative comfort of 17th / 18th.
I totally believe this too. Not sure who that manager is. And I do like Selles young, energetic, high press game.
I'd like to think, sort the top out and the rest will solve itself.
Remember when we were about 22nd and hopeless under Rodgers. And we sacked him after 22 games and finished 9th?
Maybe not that drastic, but with a decent manager and a feel good atmosphere we could soar up to mid table. Still 3/4ers of the season to play.
Snowflake Royal
» 28 Oct 2023 20:50
We haven't been able to defend in wide areas for 3 years now, it's been probably the weakest defensive area of our game for years.
Funnily enough, I remember an post-match Paul Ince interview (kudos if you remember which game) where he mentioned it was in our "culture" to sit back and protect a lead, and he couldn't understand why (despite being the manager, first problem). It's like it's in our culture to be poor at defending in wide areas and from crosses. (It could just be in our culture that we are poor at defending in general).
I think the problem in the wide defensive areas is we're expecting our full-backs to be involved in attacks, whilst also being good defensively. There aren't many players that can do both well (at our level) - that is be good going forward, whilst also being good defensively; players tend to be good at one aspect or mediocre at both.
I think the only real solutions for us at the moment would be: not allowing the full-backs to advance as far up the pitch during attacks as they do currently; playing with a holding midfielder who remains deep during attacks (or could drop into a CB position); or playing with three CBs. The latter two should ensure there's enough defensive cover when the FBs push forward.
I think it was a lot better today. In previous games we've been wide open there. Today I think Pompey were crossing from deeper and putting more men in the box than we've generally seen. And we were winning so little in the air with defenders present.
Clyde1998
» 28 Oct 2023 21:26
I think the problem in the wide defensive areas is we're expecting our full-backs to be involved in attacks, whilst also being good defensively. There aren't many players that can do both well (at our level) - that is be good going forward, whilst also being good defensively; players tend to be good at one aspect or mediocre at both.
I think the only real solutions for us at the moment would be: not allowing the full-backs to advance as far up the pitch during attacks as they do currently; playing with a holding midfielder who remains deep during attacks (or could drop into a CB position); or playing with three CBs. The latter two should ensure there's enough defensive cover when the FBs push forward.
But it was a thing last season as well, we were extremely poor at defending from wide areas and we played without advancing wing backs and with 3 CB's. Granted, that's probably because we invited a lot more pressure rather than leaving ourselves wide open like we do now so understand that it is different in itself, but we just seem really, really poor at defending wide areas.
I could understand being worse last season against better quality opposition, but I think it's also just a combination of our full backs just not being very good in general, manager tactics as well as mentality. When was the last time we genuinely had decent full backs? Richards and Yiadom/Esteves? Even they were flawed but a marked improvement on everything we've had since (Yiadom post the 7th-placed season under Pauno).
I can't really remember much from that season - being the Covid one - so can't remember how we looked defensively. However, I think that season we did benefit from having a largely settled team - especially in midfield. We had the two DMs of Laurent and Rinomhota, along with the usual CB pairing of Morrison and Moore. The players probably knew clearly what their roles were and who was responsible for certain areas of the pitch. I think the balance of the team helped that season too, albeit we completely fell away towards the end of the season. That said, our RB wasn't consistent - with Yiadom, Esteves and Holmes all playing there. The next season we didn't consistently play the same players at DM and CB, which hurt us defensively (we also lost Richards).
I can't remember the last time I was completely confident in our FBs (maybe 2016-17 - but even then I wasn't happy when Blackett played LB). It's probably a combination of players, formation, tactics and mentality.
Sutekh
» 28 Oct 2023 21:30
Exactly what is wrong with this club. The continual appointment of dead duck turds as managers instead of someone with a bit of experience/flexibility and these were even known as such to much of the supporter base from the getgo. It's honestly at the point where some fans would make for better managers, christ even I'd know it's better to build your way of playing around the players you have and i'd be about as much use as a manager as a chocolate teapot however much i'd enjoy being in the role. Get a new owner with a bit of football knowledge/understanding and we might start getting somewhere....
YorkshireRoyal99
» 28 Oct 2023 22:01
But it was a thing last season as well, we were extremely poor at defending from wide areas and we played without advancing wing backs and with 3 CB's. Granted, that's probably because we invited a lot more pressure rather than leaving ourselves wide open like we do now so understand that it is different in itself, but we just seem really, really poor at defending wide areas.
I could understand being worse last season against better quality opposition, but I think it's also just a combination of our full backs just not being very good in general, manager tactics as well as mentality. When was the last time we genuinely had decent full backs? Richards and Yiadom/Esteves? Even they were flawed but a marked improvement on everything we've had since (Yiadom post the 7th-placed season under Pauno).
I can't really remember much from that season - being the Covid one - so can't remember how we looked defensively. However, I think that season we did benefit from having a largely settled team - especially in midfield. We had the two DMs of Laurent and Rinomhota, along with the usual CB pairing of Morrison and Moore. The players probably knew clearly what their roles were and who was responsible for certain areas of the pitch. I think the balance of the team helped that season too, albeit we completely fell away towards the end of the season. That said, our RB wasn't consistent - with Yiadom, Esteves and Holmes all playing there. The next season we didn't consistently play the same players at DM and CB, which hurt us defensively (we also lost Richards).
I can't remember the last time I was completely confident in our FBs (maybe 2016-17 - but even then I wasn't happy when Blackett played LB). It's probably a combination of players, formation, tactics and mentality.
I was never a fan of Blackett, I guess we weren't bad there when Bowen was in charge, but probably more because it's when we were bloated with full backs that season, especially LB.
It has just seemed to be a problem area for us for a number of years now really and as we have said, it's probably a combination of a lot of things, leading to us not being very good.
Sutekh
» 28 Oct 2023 22:07
I can't really remember much from that season - being the Covid one - so can't remember how we looked defensively. However, I think that season we did benefit from having a largely settled team - especially in midfield. We had the two DMs of Laurent and Rinomhota, along with the usual CB pairing of Morrison and Moore. The players probably knew clearly what their roles were and who was responsible for certain areas of the pitch. I think the balance of the team helped that season too, albeit we completely fell away towards the end of the season. That said, our RB wasn't consistent - with Yiadom, Esteves and Holmes all playing there. The next season we didn't consistently play the same players at DM and CB, which hurt us defensively (we also lost Richards).
I can't remember the last time I was completely confident in our FBs (maybe 2016-17 - but even then I wasn't happy when Blackett played LB). It's probably a combination of players, formation, tactics and mentality.
I was never a fan of Blackett, I guess we weren't bad there when Bowen was in charge, but probably more because it's when we were bloated with full backs that season, especially LB.
It has just seemed to be a problem area for us for a number of years now really and as we have said, it's probably a combination of a lot of things, leading to us not being very good.
It's only a problem because of the numpty that's being employed as a manager, an intelligent manager would solve the issue through their flexibility.
hughsies no.1
» 28 Oct 2023 22:21
- Great having Yids back, probably best performance from our side today, reports of him shhhh’ing fans a shame but don’t think booing the team after todays performance was justified (it was Tuesday of corse), but booing them today was doing no good and perhaps just a captain trying to protect his team?!
- Elliot, how how how does he not start, best player on pitch when he came on even though he was stuck on the right, he’s a centre midfielder, he’s the best we have , START HIM
- Hutchinson, where is he? Don’t get me wrong it’s great to see Craig play as he’s an academy lad but we need experience in CDM, Hutch has been solid for me this season, something must have happened behind the scenes for him not even in squad
- Vickers, again - in the stands today, surely needs to be on bench at least?!
- Knibbs - did F-all again
-Abbey - no idea how he was dropped today
- Dean - I don’t get the hate towards him from a playing stand point, for me has to start with Abbey for experience
- Smith - it was a dreadful dreadful miss, confidence must be on the floor
- Selles - we can’t afford to sack him, he changed formation today which is a positive, but see above
- SJM - had a chat with him after the game, ‘nowhere even close to a takeover’ was the update he had
Won’t be at MK next Saturday - but will be at Shrewsbury.
In summary, it’s just dire really isn’t but we go again - what else are we going to do.
Match Stats
Full Time: 2-3
Half Time: 2-2
Attendance: 14417
Referee: Martin Coy
[More]
Teams
Reading:
D Button, T Bindon, A Yiadom, N Guinness-Walker (A Mbengue, 66), H Dean, L Wing, M Craig, C Savage (D Ballard, 75), H Knibbs (P Mukairu, 66), F Azeez (B Elliott, 66), S Smith (K Ehibhationham, 75).
Portsmouth:
W Norris, R Poole, J Rafferty, J Sparkes (S Raggett, 89), C Shaughnessy, A Robertson (Z Swanson, 89), T Devlin (A Kamara, 73), J Morrell, P Lane (C Saydee, 73), F Anjorin (G Whyte, 62), C Bishop.
Bookings / Red Cards
Reading: N Guinness-Walker, H Dean, L Wing, B Elliott
Sent Off: A Mbengue (90 mins).
Portsmouth: C Saydee, A Robertson
League One on 28 October 2023
This League One game took place 874 days ago in the 2023/2024 season.

