News and Views

Transfers Continue As Swift Joins Royals

14 July 2016
By Hob Nob Anyone?

Reading have completed the signing of midfielder John Swift from Chelsea. The 21 year old player signs on a three year contract that can be extended to four years. Swift came through the Chelsea youth system after a spell at Portsmouth. He turned professional in 2014 at Chelsea before heading out on loan to Rotherham, Swindon and then finally Brentford last season. He enjoyed his best success at Brentford where he became a key first team player after his arrival in October 2015. He went on to make 28 appearances for the Bees, scoring seven goals before his loan spell finished at the end of the season.

Swift looks like a very bright home grown prospect and has played for all levels of the England team from Under 16 up to Under 21, making three appearances to date for the under 21s. Swift is expected to link up with the squad in Holland for pre-season training and could feature in Friday night's friendly.

 

Discussion On This Story:

 George_

» 11 Jul 2016 12:11

Charles Watts:

Reading are working on a deal to sign midfielder John Swift.

The England Under-21 international is a free agent having come to the end of his contract with Chelsea.

Several Championship clubs are looking to snap up the 21-year-old and getreading understands Royals are firmly in the race for his signature.

The attacking midfielder spent last season on loan at Brentford, scoring seven goals in 28 games for the Bees.

Swift, who can also operate on the left side of a front three, has been with Chelsea since 2007 and has progressed through the youth ranks at Stamford Bridge.

 royalp-we

» 11 Jul 2016 12:37

This is far more suited to our type of signing, championship experience, at an age to impress & similar to the Sidwell deal - fingers crossed.

 linkenholtroyal

» 11 Jul 2016 12:38

tshibola out swift in, CM for CM 7 goals in 28 games, 21 years old and wont cost us a vast amount (payment for Chelsea for development. still leaves some money in the kitty for a good striker you would hope.

 One8Seven1*

» 11 Jul 2016 12:45



These are the singings I like/miss.

 genome

» 11 Jul 2016 12:58

Yup this would be an excellent signing. Can't help feel he'll go to Brentford though.

Plus his name makes him sound like a secret agent, so I'm IN :!:

 TheBaldOne

» 11 Jul 2016 13:19

Watts says Swift is likely to play on the left of the front three if he signs, which is a shame as I really wanted Fosu to nail down that spot . But Swift looks like a very decent player and highly though of, so hopefully can only be good for the club.

 Sutekh

» 11 Jul 2016 13:39

 tidus_mi2

» 11 Jul 2016 14:18


Doesn't compensation only happen if the signing happens through a bosman? As he's already released it should be completely free unless I'm wrong.

 Pepe the Horseman

» 11 Jul 2016 14:43

Hopefully he's gonna play, play, play, play, play.

 genome

» 11 Jul 2016 14:53

Apparently he's told Brentford that they are never, ever, ever, ever, getting back together.

 Nameless

» 11 Jul 2016 15:47


Doesn't compensation only happen if the signing happens through a bosman? As he's already released it should be completely free unless I'm wrong.

Surely that is what a Bosman deal is ?
Pre Bosman a player who was out of contract still had his registration retained by his club who could charge a fee for it. Post Bosman a player became a free agent and owned his own registration.

 YateleyRoyal

» 11 Jul 2016 16:08



Had a fall out with the fans at the end of last season. Doubt he'll go there.

 linkenholtroyal

» 11 Jul 2016 16:17


Doesn't compensation only happen if the signing happens through a bosman? As he's already released it should be completely free unless I'm wrong.

Surely that is what a Bosman deal is ?
Pre Bosman a player who was out of contract still had his registration retained by his club who could charge a fee for it. Post Bosman a player became a free agent and owned his own registration.
i thought if they were under a certain age and had been associated with the club for a certain amount of time there was a fee towards the cost of training. wasn't Danny Ings from Burnley to Liverpool like this. It is known as compensation i Believe, I may be wrong though.....

 Pepe the Horseman

» 11 Jul 2016 16:25



Had a fall out with the fans at the end of last season. Doubt he'll go there.
What happened?

 Maneki Neko

» 11 Jul 2016 16:48



I was going to go with satirical quotes from a modest proposal, but I see you've already gone low brow.
so ill leave it

plus I oxf*rd love tay tay

 Pepe the Horseman

» 11 Jul 2016 16:55



I was going to go with satirical quotes from a modest proposal, but I see you've already gone low brow.
so ill leave it

plus I oxf*rd love tay tay
*crotch bump*

 CountryRoyal

» 11 Jul 2016 17:06



Had a fall out with the fans at the end of last season. Doubt he'll go there.
What happened?



Not really that big of a deal imho.

 From Despair To Where?

» 11 Jul 2016 17:16



Surely that is what a Bosman deal is ?
Pre Bosman a player who was out of contract still had his registration retained by his club who could charge a fee for it. Post Bosman a player became a free agent and owned his own registration.
i thought if they were under a certain age and had been associated with the club for a certain amount of time there was a fee towards the cost of training. wasn't Danny Ings from Burnley to Liverpool like this. It is known as compensation i Believe, I may be wrong though.....

He has to be offered equal or better terms by the club for them to be eligible for compensation. If Chelsea haven't, he can walk away on a free.

 Ian Royal

» 11 Jul 2016 18:28



It would be a massive ask for Fosu to start week in week out. Not sure what this all means for Rakels...

LF - Swift / Rakels / Fosu
RF - Mendes / McCleary / Samuel / Barratt
ST - Kermorgant / Mendes / Rakels / Samuel

?

 NewCorkSeth

» 11 Jul 2016 18:56



It would be a massive ask for Fosu to start week in week out. Not sure what this all means for Rakels...

LF - Swift / Rakels / Fosu
RF - Mendes / McCleary / Samuel / Barratt
ST - Kermorgant / Mendes / Rakels / Samuel

?
Sorry to question this if its already been addressed but how do we know Mendes is a right sided forward? I havent seen that anywhere (as of yet) and if it has been stated why is he ahead of McCleary in the line up?

 Ian Royal

» 11 Jul 2016 19:41



It would be a massive ask for Fosu to start week in week out. Not sure what this all means for Rakels...

LF - Swift / Rakels / Fosu
RF - Mendes / McCleary / Samuel / Barratt
ST - Kermorgant / Mendes / Rakels / Samuel

?
Sorry to question this if its already been addressed but how do we know Mendes is a right sided forward? I havent seen that anywhere (as of yet) and if it has been stated why is he ahead of McCleary in the line up?

I believe it was said he can play as a wide forward... presumably somewhere on the thread about him... can't recall. Being ahead of McCleary is just a bit of whim really and because he's a new signing and so presumably supposed to be an improvement somewhere. McCleary's more a winger than a forward and also hasn't been at his best for a long time.

It's not meant to be definitive. It's all rather guess based and unclear given our somewhat uninspiring options.

 Nameless

» 11 Jul 2016 20:55



It would be a massive ask for Fosu to start week in week out. Not sure what this all means for Rakels...


?

Fosu is 20, 21 in November.
Why would it be difficult for him to play every week ? Plenty of younger players manage it.

 Ian Royal

» 11 Jul 2016 21:04



It would be a massive ask for Fosu to start week in week out. Not sure what this all means for Rakels...


?

Fosu is 20, 21 in November.
Why would it be difficult for him to play every week ? Plenty of younger players manage it.
Lack of experience in first team football. He's got 9 career starts, split between Leagues One and Two. Plus he's also more the sort of player who will drift in and out of games. I'm not saying physically he can't play 90 minutes twice a week. I think it's a big ask to expect him to do it and regularly produce the required quality.

 Anonymous

» 11 Jul 2016 22:50



Fosu is 20, 21 in November.
Why would it be difficult for him to play every week ? Plenty of younger players manage it.
Lack of experience in first team football. He's got 9 career starts, split between Leagues One and Two. Plus he's also more the sort of player who will drift in and out of games. I'm not saying physically he can't play 90 minutes twice a week. I think it's a big ask to expect him to do it and regularly produce the required quality.

Ian has always had an uneducated issue with Fosu.

 genome

» 12 Jul 2016 09:34



Fosu is 20, 21 in November.
Why would it be difficult for him to play every week ? Plenty of younger players manage it.
Lack of experience in first team football. He's got 9 career starts, split between Leagues One and Two. Plus he's also more the sort of player who will drift in and out of games. I'm not saying physically he can't play 90 minutes twice a week. I think it's a big ask to expect him to do it and regularly produce the required quality.

Holy conjecture, Batman! :lol:

 TBM

» 12 Jul 2016 10:02


Doesn't compensation only happen if the signing happens through a bosman? As he's already released it should be completely free unless I'm wrong.

Surely that is what a Bosman deal is ?
Pre Bosman a player who was out of contract still had his registration retained by his club who could charge a fee for it. Post Bosman a player became a free agent and owned his own registration.

If Chelsea haven't offered him a contract then he is free to leave (they have just let his contact run out). If they did offer him a new deal and he turns them down, then the bosman ruling comes into play.

 Nameless

» 12 Jul 2016 10:05

Ian, how often have you seen him play to say he will drift in and out of games ?
If temperamentally he cannot manage 90 minutes then he's probably not going to make it as a player. To claim on no real evidence that he can't manage a full game, let alone play regularly seems odd.
What is your opinion on Samuel ? I think there should be more concerns about him as he has had injury problems and at U21 level he did go missing in games....

 Nameless

» 12 Jul 2016 10:08



Surely that is what a Bosman deal is ?
Pre Bosman a player who was out of contract still had his registration retained by his club who could charge a fee for it. Post Bosman a player became a free agent and owned his own registration.

If Chelsea haven't offered him a contract then he is free to leave (they have just let his contact run out). If they did offer him a new deal and he turns them down, then the bosman ruling comes into play.

The two situations are the same though.
The issue is how that affects a player and development compensation.
A player can walk away whether he is offered a new deal or not, but when does compensation kick in ? That is nothing to do with Bosman.

 maffff

» 12 Jul 2016 10:14

Apparently he was shit at Brentford.

 Anonymous

» 12 Jul 2016 10:16



Ian was spouting the same shit a year ago. He basically heard one guy say it and now he just repeats it without ever seeing him play. Every time Fosu is mentioned anywhere in this forum, Ian is sure to respond within minutes.

Has a real issue.


Share this article: